Spurs are a dynasty ! just like Eva Longoria is so fucking hot!

Would this be a bad time to mention that basketball is a game for gangsters and pussies?

___________________
"An opinion is what you have when you don't have any facts. When you have the facts, you don't need an opinion." - Solomon Short
Facebook

quote:

Originally posted by djjonas Which all happen to be big market teams

most of them. It's more a function of location & history than the size of the market. For instance, only NY gets more coverage than Boston, despite the fact that Dallas, San Francisco, LA, Philly, & Chicago all have bigger markets than MA.

also, I love the fact that you're calling it the 'greatest contemporary dynasty,' when, in the middle of their run, ANOTHER TEAM won 3 titles in a row, and made it to the finals again in that same 5-year stretch. Yes. Such domination.

there are only 3 teams that have had dynasties in the NBA--the Lakers, Celtics, & Bulls. No, you can't join the club.

I can understand if you said only Celtics and Lakers were dynasties because they both have like 10+ championships, but if you throw the Bulls in there with only 6 why can't the Spurs be there with 4 + however many they are still going to win here soon.

___________________
I've never been able to eat a whole baby.
Kill the women. Eat the children.
It's just one of those days where you want to bend over everyone you know and kiss their ass goodbye with a big sideways boot.

Latest Mix

Someone mention the Spurs? Aren't they that newly-crowned dynasty?

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by Dirk W. People in Dallas aren't *ssholes. Just look at me, I live in Dallas.

Meat is Murder...tasty, tasty murder.

And the Lamest Discussion Evar award goes to... *drumroll*

*pause*

"what constitutes an NBA dynasty"

___________________
"I played 12.30 til close at 3am at the club (Antro), following on from an Australian dj,
which seemed unusual in deepest Texas." - Judge Jules

quote:

Originally posted by Zild I can understand if you said only Celtics and Lakers were dynasties because they both have like 10+ championships, but if you throw the Bulls in there with only 6 why can't the Spurs be there with 4 + however many they are still going to win here soon.

because it's taken the spurs longer to get their 4 (including one from a strike-shortened season) than it took the Bulls to get 6, they've never won in back-to-back years, and they have never been truly dominant. Please see the statistics from the last page.

Last time I checked, we didn't have any time machines lying around, so unless you got ahold of one of those contraptions, you can't mark them down for any more yet.

this really is the worst thread ever

___________________
Helping girls make bad decisions since 1979

quote:

Originally posted by davemolina Someone mention the Spurs? Aren't they that newly-crowned dynasty?

Yes yes they are the newly crowned dynasty.

___________________
I've never been able to eat a whole baby.
Kill the women. Eat the children.
It's just one of those days where you want to bend over everyone you know and kiss their ass goodbye with a big sideways boot.

Latest Mix

you must have a lot of spare crowns lying around if you're just tossing them to everybody who wins a title. Can the Marlins get one of those? I know the Ravens probably want one, too.

quote:

Originally posted by inconspicuous you must have a lot of spare crowns lying around if you're just tossing them to everybody who wins a title. Can the Marlins get one of those? I know the Ravens probably want one, too.

Oooh!!! Oooh!!!

We can give one to the Spurs!!! No one's mentioned them yet!!!

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by Dirk W. People in Dallas aren't *ssholes. Just look at me, I live in Dallas.

Meat is Murder...tasty, tasty murder.