 |
|
|
|
 |
Halcyon+On+On
Liebchen

Registered: Sep 2004
Location: midcoast
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
As for the subject of voting, I consider it a complete and utter myth that it would make any difference to the introduction of such policies. This kind of thing will happen and continues to happen no matter which party or politician ends up in power, and there are far too many flaws on just about every level of the democratic system for good political policy to actually be consistently rewarded. The only merit voting has is to sustain the overall structure of democracy, whereby leaders must at least affect a pretext of caring for their people if they want to prolong their personal spasm of power. So don't worry about taking responsibility for anything, because you have no real influence anyway. |
While I think that everything that you said is absolutely true, I still think your cynicism is undue. Though fuck knows I cannot argue with you on the basis of any history or even current facts, and can only disagree on what is fundamentally an emotional level... I just proved your point because I admit I still have some semblance of faith in a process that systematically compels people to vote contrary to their own interests. Fuck.
But the issue is indeed compounded by the election process in itself; if Americans want to see real change, they would broaden their considerations beyond what President or which 'Party' holds sway over Senate and Congress, and focus more on the informed process of electing legitimate representatives of the people, at all levels of government. Instead, we get daisy-chained investments in the puppet interests of corporations driven by shareholders rather than equanimity for its constituency and jurisprudence in spirit of a progressive national consciousness, because the creed of the Free Market has become newspeak for ritual transubstantiation of private property to private service. Highfalutin, I know! But not enough people are aware of the true scope of checks and balances, and the conglomerated instances of elected Senators and Representatives to fractionally support vestments contrary to both the expressed principles they were elected on as well as the long-term ramifications of privatization.
How to get this across to more people, or better yet, inform the electorate of such convenient, little injustices that can be so readily dismissed with a balking accusation of stigmatic ignorance? I don't know, but maybe the transition from narrow to broad-source media will drive for us a more thoroughly conscious and conscientious future... so long as we can successfully safeguard the foundations of free speech.
___________________
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Last edited by Halcyon+On+On on Jun-11-2013 at 17:18
|
|
Jun-11-2013 17:13
|
|
|
 |
 |
OrangestO
–30–

Registered: Feb 2010
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
While I think that everything that you said is absolutely true, I still think your cynicism is undue. Though fuck knows I cannot argue with you on the basis of any history or even current facts, and can only disagree on what is fundamentally an emotional level... I just proved your point because I admit I still have some semblance of faith in a process that systematically compels people to vote contrary to their own interests. Fuck.
But the issue is indeed compounded by the election process in itself; if Americans want to see real change, they would broaden their considerations beyond what President or which 'Party' holds sway over Senate and Congress, and focus more on the informed process of electing legitimate representatives of the people, at all levels of government. Instead, we get daisy-chained investments in the puppet interests of corporations driven by shareholders rather than equanimity for its constituency and jurisprudence in spirit of a progressive national consciousness, because the creed of the Free Market has become newspeak for ritual transubstantiation of private property to private service. Highfalutin, I know! But not enough people are aware of the true scope of checks and balances, and the conglomerated instances of elected Senators and Representatives to fractionally support vestments contrary to both the expressed principles they were elected on as well as the long-term ramifications of privatization.
How to get this across to more people, or better yet, inform the electorate of such convenient, little injustices that can be so readily dismissed with a balking accusation of stigmatic ignorance? I don't know, but maybe the transition from narrow to broad-source media will drive for us a more thoroughly conscious and conscientious future... so long as we can successfully safeguard the foundations of free speech. |
A lot of words for something that can be summed up in very few.
|
|
Jun-11-2013 17:24
|
|
|
 |
 |
hardcore trancer
Mystic Mind

Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Toronto,Canada
|
|
|
Jun-11-2013 17:24
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 00:36.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|