|
| quote: | Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
alright i drifted off. Im merely proposing that evolution does not relate to RIGHT AND WRONG. If the pretext is wrong, you will still have wrong. and the cycle continues heading in that direction. like a fork in the road. YOU go the wrong way, your giong to continue to fork off the wrong way with the set path (the environment being analagous to that path and evolution being analagous to forking). |
except as i unfortunately have to state repeatedly here, there is no such thing as an unnatural nature, and when you mean unnatural by "wrong", there is no wrong environment.
| quote: | Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
this is incorrect, the definition of evolution dictates speciation to occur. So once a species has fully evolved it can no longer reproduce with its own kind and thus is a new species. (the genetic changes have been made significant enough so the species can not interact).
So in fact evolution basically dictates RANDOM genetic changes in which an organism that is best suited for an environment will continue to reproduce in and survive in it. When the genetic change is significant, evolution ensues and causes speciation.
End result, evolution doesn not necessarily mean right, it means RANDOM changes that allow an organism to cope with its environment, when the random genetic changes are significant enough, speciation (evolution)occurs. and you have two speicis who can nolonger reproduce with eachother. The specie which is more suited for that environment will survive, while the other fails.
Now this is my standpoint. |
jesus titty fucking christ, get some reading comprehension karim.
you could've spared yourself all that typing by writing "this is incorrect. this is correct".
___________________
People who own my ass: Citric Acid, Boomer187, Tribu, Sand Leaper,
Jackson, venomX, jamie, Renegade, Konjin, Akridrot, Miss Bliss.
Psy-T - Down The Rabbit Hole (400minute long acid set)
|