quote:

Originally posted by Orbax and out of fuckign nowhere its Amber

I lurk from time to time

meow

You deleted me on MSN so no meow for you

quote:

Originally posted by trancebrat You deleted me on MSN so no meow for you

You never post in COR anymore so -infinity meows for you

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by ******** Seplling don't demonstrate intelligence and educatoin - knowing does.

quote:

Originally posted by Clovis You never post in COR anymore so -infinity meows for you

Pffffft I'm posting now aren't I?

I think that a lack of moderation, a tendency toward extremism, is more common among men than women.

Men are more numerous than women at both extremes of IQ (130+ IQ and retarded), more likely to murder many, many people, more likely to die for fanatical causes, and do all sorts of other awful, extreme things.

My hypothesis is that they are also more likely to become obsessively, single-mindedly driven toward a goal, which is often a prerequisite for getting to the "top" of a field.

One could make a silly, pat sociobiological argument that it generally doesn't "pay," evolutionarily, for women to be obsessed about anything other than beautifying themselves and raising their children, and so they have in general inherited a tendency to do just that. But sociobiology consists mostly of "just-so" stories that any person of reasonable intelligence could think up in their spare time. Not anything conclusive there, at least that I've seen. It could be biological, social, or both.

Last edited by MrJiveBoJingles on Jul-20-2007 at 07:30

quote:

Originally posted by trancebrat You deleted me on MSN so no meow for you

what no i didnt you blocked me

quote:

Originally posted by MrJiveBoJingles A think that a lack of moderation, a tendency toward extremism, is more common among men than women. Men are more numerous than women at both extremes of IQ (130+ IQ and retarded), more likely to murder many, many people, more likely to die for fanatical causes, and do all sorts of other awful, extreme things. My hypothesis is that they are also more likely to become obsessively, single-mindedly driven toward a goal, which is often a prerequisite for getting to the "top" of a field. One could make a silly, pat sociobiological argument that it generally doesn't "pay," evolutionarily, for women to be obsessed about anything other than beautifying themselves and raising their children, and so they have in general inherited a tendency to do just that. But sociobiology consists mostly of "just-so" stories that any person of reasonable intelligence could think up in their spare time. Not anything conclusive there, at least that I've seen. It could be biological, social, or both.

good points. I wasn't aware that men had higher ratios of both geniuses and retards. Thats very interesting.

quote:

Originally posted by Slylee oh PUHLEEASE! i was making this same fucking argument in my thread about gays being pointless and that's when u started hating me

I never stated that I agreed with the way the world works, just offered up a viable theory as to why it does

___________________
My Mixes

quote:

Originally posted by Andryuha Why were men dominant since the beginning?

Because in the beginning, physical prowess was all that mattered, we didn't have the intricate social web back then, was simply he who clubs the hardest wins.

___________________
My Mixes

quote:

Originally posted by kr00t0n Because in the beginning, physical prowess was all that mattered, we didn't have the intricate social web back then, was simply he who clubs the hardest wins.

Oh yes, because there's so much living history and written records to back up that theory