|
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
yeah, that's a wonderful answer and all, but i dont buy it for a second. |
Yeah, I kind of figured you wouldn't, but then when do you ever accept anything I say without at least one challenge 
| quote: | | The main problem being (as we have discussed) that how can god expect to generate "faith" in peoples thousands of years after jesus died for our sins, if the only record we have is full of ambiguous and contradictory bullshit? If god was after our (blind) faith in the first place, why send his only begotten son (complete with magic powers no less) at all? It was ok to display definitive proof then but not now? Even though (imo) the world is in much more need of faith now than it ever was back then. Hell, some parts of the world had to wait more than 1000 years for god's message to reach them. |
God isn't after blind faith, he/it is after our love. In order to love something you must first accept that it exists, which is why revealation is necessary; however, as I stated earlier, giving full revealation (leaving no doubt) would result in people being compelled to love god rather then choosing. As far as why send Jesus to die for our sins... to gain a greater kinship with his people. Jesus, while referred to as the son of god is really part of god (for the sake of this argument you must allow that God exists because none of this matters if you exclude that possibility... so presume the existance of god... just for a few minutes). God took human form so that he could experience first hand the life of a human (think Star Trek TNG where Picard got hit by that probe thing and was given the experience of living a life in a dead civilization). So, Jesus was/is the part of God that lived as man, to give to God full knowledge of what the life of man is. God didn't give Jesus up to death as a way of Jesus being punished on behalf of man for the collective sins of man, rather, by living as Jesus - by experiencing the draw of sin first hand - God was moved to forgive the sins of man.
[QUOTE]The bible is littered with examples of an interventionist god, and now nothing? How is that consistent? (I would argue god would be consistent in all things). QUOTE]
You know that I went on a very long journey to find my faith... this is the very question that prompted that journey. I'm afraid that after 18 years I don't have an answer that would satisfy you. This is not to say I don't have an answer. I fully believe that the holy spirit is at work in the world, not by direct intervention by by divine inspiration. I know that you're looking for the big miracles, the pillars of fire; however, the time of revealation is past. The work of god in the world in now the work of those moved by the holy spirit. Why has God stopped with the big shows? I can't say, I still haven't been able to reconsile that.
___________________
| quote: | Originally posted by RickyM
you're just a shit version of Moral Hazard. At least he knows what he's talking about. |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
lol, i love it when moral feels the need to lay the smack down 
|
|