|
| quote: | Originally posted by Dervish
You said:
People who make the choice to put themselves in such positions are still responsible for making ethical decisions
which infers that because they decided to be there that they should deal with it like it is a normal job.
What aside from taking a watch is unethical about what happened? Taking a worthless watch? (and to me that is only marginally unethical, it wasn't a gold brick marked "for the children" was it?) |
AKA
| quote: | Originally posted by RandomGirl
people in horrible situations should not use that as an excuse to make unethical decisions. |
Just reworded.
OR
| quote: | Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
To clarify, Theresa said that just because you're in a shit situation doesn't mean ethics go out the window. |
How do you know that the man he killed did not have a wife, children or friends? Perhaps his wife gave him that watch on their anniversary? Maybe he had it on as a reminder of his loved ones. Maybe it was just a piece of shit watch. Who the frig knows, and really, who cares? The point is:
| quote: | Originally posted by nchs09
Stealing is stealing. No matter if its a child's bike or a watch or a folder with papers in it. |
|