quote:

Originally posted by cronodevir Logic and Observation both show that things that do not exist cannot do. Because to do something is an attribute, and a thing that does not exist does not have attributes.

Sounds like a good argument against creationism (god)!

quote:

The contention in the big bang theory is that something [the universe] brought itself into being, which is just wrong.

I'm pretty sure that your idea about the big bang theory is wrong.. I don't know much about it, but I do know it doesn't say nothing banged, there was something there before.

___________________


https://soundcloud.com/ghostea stuff

quote:

Originally posted by mysticalninja Sounds like a good argument against creationism (god)! I'm pretty sure that your idea about the big bang theory is wrong.. I don't know much about it, but I do know it doesn't say nothing banged, there was something there before.

1. Not really.

2. The most popular view of the big bang theory is everything just magically poofed in and of itself, into existence.

___________________
i'm the alchemist without the cyst without a doubt out of the mist
dig out the grout expose the pest to take it out without the rest

they will attest my patients restorations from the best

i'm from the west i'm not an acmeist only the alchemist

I'm pretty sure that that is only the popular view of it by people who don't really understand it. which is probably most people. i know this a common misconception, but no more than that.. well i know that it isn't actually an explosion, and it only 'banged' to about the size of a watermelon, and grew slower from there.. it wasn't even originally called the big bang theory, it was the 'primeval atom' theory.. this guy mocking it on radio gave it the big bang name and it just stuck. the big bang isn't a theory that nothing exploded.. It says there was something there before the bang, and doesn't say anything about the origin of that. It doesn't try to explain everything. perhaps someone can confirm and expand? ill have to ask me uncle, he is a physicist.

also, isn't the popular view of creationism that god made "everything magically poofed in and of itself, into existence."? how come you don't use this logic against yourself

quote:

Originally posted by cronodevir The creator doesn't go through a "process" or "method" for creating things, no change takes place on the Creator. Processes and Methodology are both created things.

If you believe in god.. doesn't that mean you believe EVERYTHING is a created thing? EXCEPT god for some reason lol.. but why?

also... where do you get these facts about the creator? do you sometimes talk to him?

man.. i thought i would never get in another religious debate. i've been doing it since i was twelve on aol chatrooms. i thought i got over it years ago.

___________________


https://soundcloud.com/ghostea stuff

Last edited by mysticalninja on May-15-2009 at 13:41

quote:

Originally posted by cronodevir Its a forum thread, its meant for discussion, so discussion took place. Idiot.

And with these kind of comments you really wonder why people tend to go against your, whether you're wrong or right.

Raphie just had a general comment on how the number of pages in this topic drasticly changed overnight, I did the same actually, it was nothing personal against you. When you start insulting another, it get's personal. Please, try avoiding this.

___________________
Upcoming releases:
Hernandes ft. Stine Groove - Without You (Kyota remix) (Redux Recordings)
Kyota - Senegal (Flashover Recordings)

http://www.youtube.com/v/yREiV0yWdsA&hl=en&fs=1

Here is a video interview that I found with josh gabriel talking about using eq to keep the sounds in their sonic space.

It is really engineering 101 you know... the stuff they teach you if you join any engineering school but what do they know?
Some of you people know it all I guess...

So run your stuff full on and mash them up on top of each other ala Jive bunny

Haha some of those advices seriosly made me crack up.. I dunno what to say really... high-pass the kick at 70 hz? In edm the kick generally sits lower than the bass mate. If you wanna highpass anything it should be the bass, or atleast make a cut on the bass where the lower end of the kick is (generally 40-60 hz), so they don't conflict.. The bass is continously shifting in freq, while the kick allways stays the same, hence you should eq the bass to fit the kick and not the opposite.

Last edited by lenieNt Force on May-15-2009 at 12:10

quote:

Originally posted by RichieV your logic is flawed. On every single soundcard made in the last 5 years(except your on board realtek) , you really don't gain anything by going above 512. It isn't better because you would gain something if it was. You must be the only person on the planet using 2048.

I use 4096, works wonders. Much better than 512, thats for sure.

quote:

Originally posted by lenieNt Force Haha some of those advices seriosly made me crack up.. I dunno what to say really... high-pass the kick at 70 hz? In edm the kick generally sits lower than the bass mate. If you wanna highpass anything it should be the bass, or atleast make a cut on the bass where the lower end of the kick is (generally 40-60 hz), so they don't conflict..

John 'OO' Fleming in the studio:
I am not even going to quote him:

Just watch at 15.35

[[ LINK REMOVED ]]



Go ahead and laugh him down too.
What does he know about edm?

quote:

Originally posted by lenieNt Force In edm the kick generally sits lower than the bass mate.

not always. more housey genres some tracks all the bass is in the bass, and the kick is just really midy

___________________


https://soundcloud.com/ghostea stuff

Existo22, no one here is saying that you shouldn't eq different elements so they fit together and occupy their own space in the mix. Of course you should, that really is basic common sense.

Why some people criticise your post is more in regards to the specific cuts you talk about. Cutting as much low out of the kick as you suggest would in many cases BUT NOT ALL, remove all the oomph and power the kick may have had. There may well be tracks out there where hp the kick at 70hz worked but there will be many more tracks that this would be completely inappropriate. In some tracks, the kick may be left completely alone and instead the bass would have small cuts to make room for the kick. It really depends on the track in question.

Many of your suggestions, whilst not wrong, would in many instances not work at all but you state them as though doing these suggestions will make a track sound more pro when in fact they could have the reverse effect.

___________________
Listen to and download all my tracks at www.gregnicot.bandcamp.com

quote:

Originally posted by mysticalninja not always. more housey genres some tracks all the bass is in the bass, and the kick is just really midy

Yea I know, and in dnb the bass also often sits lower than the kick. But like I said, generally speaking.