Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > Opinions on Obama health care initiatives
Pages (18): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
thedoggyworld
tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2007
Location: lovin it

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/28/h...cs.html?_r=1&hp

quote:

WASHINGTON — The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops has been lobbying for three decades for the federal government to provide universal health insurance, especially for the poor. Now, as President Obama tries to rally Roman Catholics and other religious voters around his proposals to do just that, a growing number of bishops are speaking out against it.

Skip to next paragraph

A new blog from The New York Times that tracks the health care debate as it unfolds.

More Health Care Overhaul News
Related
Times Topics: Roman Catholic Church | Health Care ReformReaders' Comments
Readers shared their thoughts on this article.
Read All Comments (79) »
As recently as July, the bishops’ conference had largely embraced the president’s goals, although with the caveat that any health care overhaul avoid new federal financing of abortions. But in the last two weeks some leaders of the conference, like Cardinal Justin Rigali, have concluded that Democrats’ efforts to carve out abortion coverage are so inadequate that lawmakers should block the entire effort.

Others, echoing the popular alarms about “rationing,” contend that the proposals could put a premium on efficacy that could penalize the chronically ill.

“No health care reform is better than the wrong sort of health care reform,” Bishop R. Walker Nickless of Sioux City, Iowa, declared in a recent pastoral letter, urging the faithful to call their members of Congress.

In a diocesan newspaper column this week, Archbishop Charles J. Chaput of Denver agreed, saying the proposal was “not only imprudent; it’s also dangerous.”

The bishops’ opposition — published in diocesan newspapers, disseminated online by conservative activists, and reported in a Roman Catholic newspaper to be distributed this weekend at churches around the country — is another setback for Mr. Obama’s health care efforts. His administration has been counting on the support of Catholic leaders to help rally believers behind his health care plan. Just last week, he held a conference call with 140,000 religious voters to appeal to what he called their “moral convictions.”

The bishops’ backlash reflects a struggle within the church over how heavily to weigh opposition to abortion against concerns about social justice.

“It is the great tension in Catholic thought right now,” said M. Cathleen Kaveny, a professor of law and theology at Notre Dame.

The same question, Professor Kaveny said, set off the debates over whether conscientious Catholics could vote for Mr. Obama despite his support for abortion rights, whether he should be invited to speak at Notre Dame, or whether Catholic politicians who support abortion rights, like Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., should present themselves for Communion.

Mr. Obama has said the health care overhaul should preserve the current policy that federal money not pay for elective abortions, and congressional Democrats say they are trying to do that. House health care legislation would allow the secretary of Health and Human Services to decide whether a proposed government insurance program would cover abortions. But any health insurance plan that does cover abortion — whether government-run or private — would be required to segregate its government subsidies from its patients’ premium payments so that no taxpayer money would pay for the procedure. And all patients would have the choice of plans that do and do not cover it.

House Democrats say many states similarly segregate federal money when they cover abortion under Medicaid. But abortion opponents say they take as a model the federal employees benefits program, which excludes health plans that cover abortion.

In an Aug. 11 letter to Congress, Cardinal Rigali of Philadelphia, head of the bishops’ anti-abortion efforts called the proposed division of funds “an illusion,” arguing that taxpayers would still indirectly help cover abortion. He urged lawmakers to block the current House legislation from coming up for a vote unless it can be amended to expressly prohibit financing for the procedure.

In his conference call with religious voters last week, Mr. Obama denied that his plan would mean government financing for abortions, calling such assertions “fabrications that have been put out there in order to discourage people from meeting what I consider to be a core ethical and moral obligation.”

Now, a prominent Catholic newspaper, Our Sunday Visitor, is declaring that the president was wrong, citing Cardinal Rigali’s letter about the House bill.

“U.S. Bishops, fact-checkers contradict Obama’s health claims on abortion,” declares the headline in the issue of the paper that will be distributed in many churches this weekend.

Liberal Catholic groups argued that most bishops still strongly supported the broader goals of the health care proposals. “There are certainly some strident voices out there that want to see health care reform abandoned on the back of this issue,” said Victoria Kovari, acting director of the liberal Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, “but I don’t think that is where the bishops are.”

As recently as July 17, a letter to Mr. Obama and Congress from Bishop William F. Murphy, chairman of the bishops’ domestic justice, appeared eager to back the Democrats’ effort.

Bishop Murphy of Rockville Centre, N.Y., noted that the “we strongly oppose inclusion of abortion as part of a national health care benefit.” But he emphasized the priority the church placed on coverage for the poor, calling health care “not a privilege but a right.”

“Health care is not just another issue for the Church or for a healthy society,” he wrote. “It is a fundamental issue of human life and dignity.”

On its Web site this summer, the bishops’ conference published a commentary by the Rev. Douglas Clark of Savannah, Ga., arguing that the country now rationed “health care on the basis of wealth.” Father Clark cited an encyclical last month from Pope Benedict XVI about the evils of global economic inequality.

Catholic Charities and the Catholic Health Association endorsed the president’s plan without reservation.

But as the focus has shifted to the health care overhaul’s ramifications for abortion provisions, bishops who oppose it on many grounds have grown more vocal.

“The Catholic Church does not teach that government should directly provide health care,” Bishop Nickless of Sioux City wrote, adding, “Any legislation that undermines the vitality of the private sector is suspect.”


___________________
The Democratic Party

Old Post Aug-28-2009 13:55  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for thedoggyworld Click here to Send thedoggyworld a Private Message Add thedoggyworld to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Shakka
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2003
Location:

Old Post Aug-31-2009 15:14  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Shakka Click here to Send Shakka a Private Message Add Shakka to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
The17sss
C.R.E.A.M.



Registered: May 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC

quote:
Originally posted by thedoggyworld
I doubt that one. Once health care reform passes, the 2010 is a landslide for Republicans.


Fixed... considering the majority of americans do not want it passed in its current form.

Old Post Sep-01-2009 05:33  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for The17sss Click here to Send The17sss a Private Message Add The17sss to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
thedoggyworld
tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2007
Location: lovin it

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
Fixed... considering the majority of americans do not want it passed in its current form.


It will pass whether or not the Republican Senate wants it or not. The Republican Senate is lagging, especially Chack Grassley. The guy needs to resign, along with the rest of the Republican Senate. If they do not I couldn't see how public executions of the Republican Senate would be that lagging behind.


___________________
The Democratic Party

Old Post Sep-01-2009 20:24  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for thedoggyworld Click here to Send thedoggyworld a Private Message Add thedoggyworld to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Shakka
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2003
Location:

Let's have an honest debate about this whole health care thing, right?

Old Post Sep-02-2009 15:19  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Shakka Click here to Send Shakka a Private Message Add Shakka to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
The17sss
C.R.E.A.M.



Registered: May 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC

quote:
Originally posted by Shakka
Let's have an honest debate about this whole health care thing, right?



haha... but but... it's the republicans who astroturf!

Old Post Sep-03-2009 19:28  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for The17sss Click here to Send The17sss a Private Message Add The17sss to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
The17sss
C.R.E.A.M.



Registered: May 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC

MoveOn.org member bites off finger of man who opposed Obamacare at rally:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/200...itten-off-.html





but it's the GOP who are "evil mongers", "nazis", "psychos", and "violent angry mobs"

Old Post Sep-03-2009 19:39  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for The17sss Click here to Send The17sss a Private Message Add The17sss to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Shakka
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2003
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
MoveOn.org member bites off finger of man who opposed Obamacare at rally:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/200...itten-off-.html





but it's the GOP who are "evil mongers", "nazis", "psychos", and "violent angry mobs"


Holy shit! I hope he has good insurance...and a good lawyer.

Old Post Sep-03-2009 20:13  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Shakka Click here to Send Shakka a Private Message Add Shakka to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Moongoose
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Celje, Slovenia

I dont.





quote:
by Bill Maher

And I have to say this, if you get injured while fighting against health care, you have to lie there and bleed. You just do. I'm sorry.


___________________

Old Post Sep-04-2009 00:30  Slovenia
Click Here to See the Profile for Moongoose Click here to Send Moongoose a Private Message Add Moongoose to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
MisterOpus1
Grumpy Old Fart



Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Kansas City

quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
MoveOn.org member bites off finger of man who opposed Obamacare at rally:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/200...itten-off-.html





but it's the GOP who are "evil mongers", "nazis", "psychos", and "violent angry mobs"


Yeah, right. Whatever you say, champ. What exactly happened again?:

quote:
A 65-year-old man had his finger bitten off Wednesday evening at a health care rally in Thousand Oaks, according to the Ventura County Sheriff's Department.

Sheriff's investigators were called to Hillcrest and Lynn Road at 7:26 p.m.

About 100 protesters sponsored by MoveOn.org were having a rally supporting health care reform. A group of anti-health care reform protesters formed across the street.

A witness from the scene says a man was walking through the anti-reform group to get to the pro-reform side when he got into an altercation with the 65-year-old, who opposes health care reform.

The 65-year-old was apparently aggressive and hit the other man, who then retaliated by biting off his attacker's pinky, according to Karoli from DrumsnWhistles.

The man took his finger and walked to Los Robles hospital for treatment.

http://www.ktla.com/news/landing/kt...0,7135717.story


According to eyewitnesses:

quote:
To be clear here: There were no threats, no dark moods, and there was no mob. I repeat, there was no mob. We were peaceful people holding candles and signs.

(snip)However, there is no question that Orange Shirt guy was aching to fight, was willing to pick a fight, and certainly didn’t care who he fought with. He chose people who were shorter than he, and he used his voice, his body, his body language and his height to intimidate them.

http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2009/09/03/health-care-vigil-in-thousand-oaks-provocation-to-violent-response/


The "man who opposed Obamacare" threw the first punch, but yet he isn't a "violent angry mob?!?!?" Sorry he got his finger bit off and all, but who got violent first here?

And the biggest fucking irony of all? The fucking douchebag wingnut teabagger HAD GOVERNMENT-RUN MEDICARE!!!!!! Wonder if he's going to give his Social Security payments and Medicare back to the government anytime soon....

Keep those stories running. They're terrific.


___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...

Last edited by MisterOpus1 on Sep-04-2009 at 19:25

Old Post Sep-04-2009 19:15  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for MisterOpus1 Click here to Send MisterOpus1 a Private Message Add MisterOpus1 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
MisterOpus1
Grumpy Old Fart



Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Kansas City

quote:
Originally posted by Shakka
Somebody finish the quote: "God loves Marines..."



The following rant below is aimed at the gentleman in the video, not because he is a Marine and served our country with honor, but because of his misplaced beliefs as well as others like him:

I'm sorry, but was that guy supposed to actually be inspiring somehow? Sure didn't take long for the fucknut to reference Nazis.

So fucking ridiculous, Shakka, I really wonder if you think it's worth addressing? But I always tend to question whenever I hear wingnut shits like that guy, where the fuck were they when it was revealed just how intrusive Bush was in our domestic surveillance?

Where the fuck was he when Bush thought it prudent to expand our government to such levels not seen by just the last Democratic president (who, strangely had a smaller government than the last 3 Republican POTUS's), but by any president before him?

And I also wonder, does he really love the current health care system as it is? He demanded that his Rep. to keep his hands off his health care. Funny, because you can take the most drastic, hard-left, tree-hugging, government takeover House bill that's currently proposed right now, which contains the OPTION to choose government insurance like Medicare OR TO KEEP THE SAME PIECE OF SHIT INSURANCE THAT WE ALL HAVE FROM CIGNA, UNITED HEALTHCARE, ETC., and he has no fucking argument at all.

No, this twit is not arguing about health care. He's arguing because he's in a fringe nutbag group who yells quite loudly that either the African-American president is not a legitimate citizen of the U.S., the government who's been in the hands of fringe nutbags like him for 8 years is now in the hands of a party that's going to take over the government completely just like Hitler and the Nazis (and despite the phrase "Socialist" in the Nazi party's name, one can easily argue core parts of ultranationalism and authoritarianism in Fascism could have been readily apparent in extremist conservatism, i.e. the bastardized version known as neoconservatism), and that Democrats are out to kill Grandma (sadly, each point above has been easily disproven, except maybe the Nazi point which is so fucking absurd on its face it's not even worth the time).

It's fucking tiring hearing people like this. If he has a legitimate argument to present, then he needs to present it. If he's only going to yell about these asinine Limbaugh talking points without actually stopping for one fucking second to look at whether or not there's validity in those points (i.e. examining counterarguments and weighing who actually has supporting evidence), then why the fuck would I or anyone honestly take him seriously? He and the rest of the fringe fucks need to keep their paranoid asses out of the way of actually doing something worthwhile to correct this corrupt, MURDER BY SPREADSHEET, health care system while we still can. Unless they actually read the fucking bills that are out there instead of relying on slanted, extremist AM radio blowhards to deliberately distort and obfuscate the bills for them, why bother taking any of their paranoid delusions seriously?


___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...

Old Post Sep-05-2009 16:24  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for MisterOpus1 Click here to Send MisterOpus1 a Private Message Add MisterOpus1 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
MisterOpus1
Grumpy Old Fart



Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Kansas City

What a great system we currently have. We really should keep it instead of having this illegitimate, Hitleresque president change things and take over ALL OF OUR LIVES!!!!!!!!

quote:
Insured and in debt: Even with coverage Californians struggle to pay medical bills

1.4 million have medical debt despite having insurance, new report shows

By Gwendolyn Driscoll
| 8/31/2009 11:15:00 AM
More than 2.2 million California adults report having medical debt, and two-thirds of those incurred the debt while insured, according to the authors of "The State of Health Insurance in California (SHIC)," a comprehensive new report from the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research.

In total, nearly one in seven non-elderly adults in California (13 percent) have some kind of medical debt, and more than 800,000 Californians have medical debt greater than $2,000.

The state's Northern and Sierra counties are the most affected, with nearly 25 percent of the population having medical debt of some kind. Central Coast counties also had high percentages of debt. (View a breakdown of medical debt by region and county.)

Individuals with medical debt are twice as likely as those without debt to delay or forgo needed health care, the report found.

"That even insured people are forced to take on medical debt to pay for their health care is another glaring inadequacy in our current system of health insurance," said E. Richard Brown, director of the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research and lead author of the SHIC report. "Current policies either do not offer enough coverage or offer full-coverage at a cost that is too expensive for many people to bear.

"The result is that too many people have health insurance plans that leave them financially vulnerable and force them to delay the care they need."

The biennial SHIC report, produced by the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research with support from The California Endowment and The California Wellness Foundation, presents a representative view of the troubled state of health insurance coverage at a crucial moment, as members of Congress debate the merits of national health insurance reform.

The report, based on the latest data from the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS), the nation's largest state health survey, is the most comprehensive examination of health insurance coverage in the nation's most populous and diverse state.

"Heath coverage is supposed to protect Americans from the financial burden of health care costs," said Dr. Robert K. Ross, CEO and president of The California Endowment. "Americans should be outraged that the very system that they depend on for health care no longer offers that protection."

Specifically, the SHIC report found:

Medical debt results in delays in care
Californians with medical debt were much more likely than those without debt to delay getting the care they needed.


* Those with debt were twice as likely to report delays in care: 32.3 percent reported delays in getting needed care, compared with 16.1 percent of those without medical debt.



* Delays were higher as the amount of debt increased: Among those with more than $8,000 of medical debt, 43 percent reported delays in getting care.



* Debt can lead to loans and bankruptcy: Among those with medical debt, more than half (55.4 percent) reported financial consequences ranging from an inability to pay for basic necessities to credit card debt to a declaration of bankruptcy.



* High-deductible plans may contribute to medical debt: Nearly 40 percent of individuals with privately purchased insurance coverage chose plans with deductibles of $1,000 or more or, for a family plan, $2,000 or more.


Health insurance coverage is stagnating
In 2007, at the height of an economic expansion, 6.4 million Californians were uninsured for all or part of the year, a number that has changed little since 2001. Specifically:


* There has been little change in employment-based insurance: Job-based insurance covered 56.4 percent of the total non-elderly population in 2001; in 2007, coverage was at 55.6 percent.



* Employment-based children's coverage has declined: Slightly more than half (52.2 percent) of children in California were covered by their parent's employer's policy in 2007, a rate nearly three percentage points lower than in 2001 (55.1 percent).



* Public coverage is flat: Coverage of children and non-elderly adults by Medi-Cal (California's Medicaid program) and Healthy Families (California's State Children's Health Insurance Program) remained flat between 2005 and 2007, at 15.3 percent.


"It raises questions about the effectiveness of the current market-based system of private health insurance," said Dr. Shana Alex Lavarreda, director of health insurance studies and a co-author of the report. "If, at the height of an economic expansion, California's health insurance coverage was still weaker than in the past, then what does that say? It suggests that our health insurance system is at its straining point and millions of people are falling through the cracks."

In 2007, at the peak of this decade's economic expansion, 6.4 million Californians, including 1.1 million children, lacked insurance all or part of the year. Since then, the recession, severe cuts to state programs that insure children and the doubling of the state's unemployment rate have pushed the number of uninsured even higher, the report's authors say.

"With more than 6 million Californians uninsured and more than 1 million who have health insurance in medical debt, the need for comprehensive health care reform is clear," said Gary L. Yates, president and CEO of The California Wellness Foundation. "However, no matter what the outcome of reform efforts, adequate funding for the health care safety net — community clinics, public and nonprofit hospitals — must be maintained to ensure access to care for the state's uninsured and underinsured."

The California Endowment, a private, statewide health foundation, was established in 1996 to expand access to affordable, quality health care for underserved individuals and communities and to promote fundamental improvements in the health status of all Californians.

The California Wellness Foundation's mission is to improve the health of the people of California by making grants for health promotion, wellness education and disease prevention.

The California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) is the nation's largest state health survey and one of the largest health surveys in the United States.

The UCLA Center for Health Policy Research is one of the nation's leading health policy research centers and the premier source of health-related information on Californians.

For more news, visit the UCLA Newsroom or follow us on Twitter.

Gwendolyn Driscoll,
310-794-0930
[email protected]

http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucl...debt-99981.aspx


___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...

Old Post Sep-05-2009 16:31  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for MisterOpus1 Click here to Send MisterOpus1 a Private Message Add MisterOpus1 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > Opinions on Obama health care initiatives
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (18): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackId Please [2004] [1]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackDuderstadt - "Muhanjala" (Sean Tyas remix) [2007]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:44.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!