|
| quote: | Originally posted by Andrieux
Speaking of...Blurr I thought your opening set was dope. Great tracks and very epic! |
The "very epic" part is where Blurr had issues, IMO. He started off with epic and fast, which isn't what an opener should be doing, IMO, especially that early in the set -- like 11:25pm. IMO, you have to build up the night. That's the job of an opener, IMO. IMO IMO IMO IMO IMO.
Let me put it this way. For the first good while of his set, people were just standing in front of the booth...it's hard for more people to come in and be nailed with that type of music and just jump into it. Some people can, most people can't. It wasn't that the music wasn't good...it's not about that at all, it's about setting the setup to ease the crowd into it and so the it doesn't hit them like a freight train. That's a reason why progression is so, so important.
You don't want the energy to come down when the headliner comes on and you don't want to wear out the crowd before the night even peaks. And you don't want to really focus on a style, IMO, that the headliner is going to play a lot of....IMO. That can cause crowd to grow tired of that type of music by the peak hour. There are so many reasons why an opener is so crucial and in many ways is more difficult than being just the headliner. But everything I can explain is just IMO...hehe...
An opener has the possibility of making the headliners set even better. The headliner can play two different nights, each with different openers (who approach the night differently), and play the exact same set each night. I guarantee you that you'll come home with a different review of the headliner on one night compared to the other...and a large part of the influence will be the mindset the opener got you in leading into the headliners.
I'm personally petrified of ever opening up....cause I say all this shit and fear I will fail lol. Why I want to start things slow and do the small rooms lol.
|