|
| quote: | Originally posted by Jayx1
She didnt have to. She had every right to deny us our own constitution just like George III did with the Americans in the 1770's thus causing the American Revolution. See we got lucky with Queen Elizabeth II. It was her signature that allowed us to repatriot our constitution without bloodshed. As they say, the pen is mightier than the sword.
THAT is why she deserves to be on our money
PS: the other half that you point out was written by British lords and ascented by the British House of Commons. 1982 meant that our own House of Commons could sign off on any law passed instead of having to send it to a foreign country for approval. |
For her to lift up a pen and SIGN something means diddly squat. Terry fox achieved more than that rotting clam. She is just in the position to sign.. She is the queen.. it is her DUTY to sign. She can sign a million things for all I care.. it is her position that enables her to give Authority .. thats it. She was born into it.
If you think that her signing a that consitution makes her deserving to be all over our money.. have fun praising her "highness".. i could hork in her face.. now thats achieving something for Canada.
___________________
"This place isn't big enough for me to blow it up."
-MARCO V
| 
