___________________
facebook | blog | scrobbler | setarchive | 20160316
"I believe that's referred to as intelligent drum & bass, which obviously means there's a genre of stupid drum & bass out there" (John Peel)
Jan-28-2010 10:05
montana
dub come save me
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: södertälje. sweden
actually i was meant to type "and stren." but stu needed his deep dicking more than strenski.
so to summarize, fuck the gays. they need their daily dick and neither this dick
nor this dick
doesn't supply the ample amount of dick like this dick.
but all of this doesn't mean dick.
___________________
facebook | blog | scrobbler | setarchive | 20160316
"I believe that's referred to as intelligent drum & bass, which obviously means there's a genre of stupid drum & bass out there" (John Peel)
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: Newcastle, Australia
quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
I am well the fuck aware that the point you are trying to establish is that man+women=children is the "natural" way of things, and indeed, you are not wrong in this, as it is the practice most humans endeavor on. But just where is your evidence to suggest that homosexuality is unnatural? It has already been established in this thread that all range of other animals practice it as well - do you think they were corrupted by liberal society as well?
quote:
man+women=children is the "natural" way of things
Hypothetically, if humans were inherently gay I do not think we would've survived and become the dominate animal on this planet.
However since the vast majority of humans are straight there is no problem with gays, since there are more than enough to continue our species.
Jan-28-2010 11:21
Jake Benson
Supreme Vaginaddict
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: New York
quote:
Originally posted by boris_the_bear
woah.. hold your horses. i said homosexuality is not normal. i didn't say homosexuals are generally inferior or should be treated accordingly. for instance, if we have a bunch of sheep, then a white sheep would be a normal (usual) sheep and a grey/black/striped sheep would be not normal (striped sheep would be awesome actually). now all sheep are divided into those wearing a normal color and those wearing an unusual (not normal) color. where does it say that those unusually colored are inferior? same flesh, same bones, same fur.
Oh so not being normal doesn't mean inferior...even though you JUST said in the previous post that gays shouldn't have children, and that gays shouldn't use the word "family" because somehow two males or two female raising children is not parallel to two heteros raising children. Oh my bad I guess that makes them SUPERIOR.
Fuckin idiotic hypocrite. You know that you are using the term "not normal" to encompass all your biases regarding homosexuality as inferior. Your parents should have just thrown you in the garbage after you hatched out of your mom's ass.
Originally posted by Ania_xox
We are all entitled to our own beliefs, no?
If your beliefs differ from mine - that's cool.
You believe in reincarnation and I don't?
I am against abortion and you are pro-choice?
You think of the Quran as holy scripture and I rarely go to church anymore?
I am gay and you think homosexuality is unnatural?
That's cool. I'm sure we can still be friends despite our differences.
Ania_xox, I can totally respect different OPINIONS. But when people start VOTING against gay marriage and put other barriers into law, that becomes discrimination. And no, I'm not fucking cool with discrimination. So if someone tells me they are against gay marriage, I'm going to assume they're voting against it with the other 52-60% of the population unless they tell me otherwise. In fact, if someone told me they are homophobic and can't stand homosexuals but voted to expand all civil rights to homosexuals when it came to voting (essentially separating their bias from their actions) then I would respect them 100%.
