Do me a favour cyrus...

go to any other country's forum call their head of state a kunt and that you want to hork in their face and then get back to me with their reaction...

thanks

quote:

Originally posted by rabbitjoker Jayx1 is correct in calling it the Constitution. Prior it was the BNA: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/const/endnts_e.html#(2) How much more specific do you want?

It was formaly known as the BNA... still acted the same way as a constitution.. Its just another name for it. Its still considered the COnsitution act of 1867

http://www.solon.org/Constitutions/...sh/ca_1867.html
http://www.uni.ca/what_is_const.html

The consitution act of 1982 "patriated" us. I respect the act for what it is and was.... but ireally dont give a fuck if that queen signed it. She did nothing but sign thats it!

___________________
"This place isn't big enough for me to blow it up."
-MARCO V

quote:

Originally posted by Jayx1 Do me a favour cyrus... go to any other country's forum call their head of state a kunt and that you want to hork in their face and then get back to me with their reaction... thanks

I have ... Arieal sharon and President Bush and the mullahs of Iran, the Shieks of Saudi Arabia, the kings and queens of the world.. are all KUUUUUUUUUUUUUNTS!!!!

Go to the political forums.. you would love it there.

___________________
"This place isn't big enough for me to blow it up."
-MARCO V

Canada was born out of the 1867 British North America Act (BNA Act). Unlike the U.K., Canada was to be a federal state, so the BNA Act outlined the division of powers between the provincial governments and federal government. Originally an act of the British parliament, it was brought home to Canada ("Patriated") in 1982. Along with this event, the Constitution Act 1982 was passed.




The queen allowed us to govern our own country without having to go to British parliament everytime we wanted a law changed. Again, it was not her obligation to sign. She, and Britain could have said NO. She didnt.

quote:

Originally posted by Cyrus King I have ... Arieal sharon and President Bush and the mullahs of Iran, the Shieks of Saudi Arabia, the kings and queens of the world.. are all KUUUUUUUUUUUUUNTS!!!!

baah I wish they were just kunts,but BUSH,SHARON are alot more worst then just kunts they are the biggest terrorists and should go to fuckin hell.

___________________
Mystic Mind - DJ Mixes
http://soundcloud.com/mystic-mind

Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/DJMysticMind

quote:

Originally posted by Jayx1 Canada was born out of the 1867 British North America Act (BNA Act). Unlike the U.K., Canada was to be a federal state, so the BNA Act outlined the division of powers between the provincial governments and federal government. Originally an act of the British parliament, it was brought home to Canada ("Patriated") in 1982. Along with this event, the Constitution Act 1982 was passed. The queen allowed us to govern our own country without having to go to British parliament everytime we wanted a law changed. Again, it was not her obligation to sign. She, and Britain could have said NO. She didnt.

Im sure if Courtney love suddenly became queen of england.. you would cringe. Its just a POSITION!

How do you respect her as a PERSON??? How as a PERSON has she achieved something for canada. Not as the Queen.. but as an idividual without title. She didnt sacrifice anything to make canada better? She just sat in a throne all her life.

___________________
"This place isn't big enough for me to blow it up."
-MARCO V

And Prime Ministers make sacrifices? At 300 Gs a year i wouldnt think so unless their past profession was as a hockey player...then i could see 300 Gs as being a sacrifice.

I will agree with the fact that terry fox and rick hanson do deserve a spot on our currency. Perhaps in place of that native art refugee boat. At least those two were real heros, non political, and placing them would not be politically correct either.

quote:

Originally posted by Jayx1 And Prime Ministers make sacrifices? At 300 Gs a year i wouldnt think so unless their past profession was as a hockey player...then i could see 300 Gs as being a sacrifice.

On this I disagree.

We pay our PM and MPs way too little.

Maybe if we started to pay them a reasonable amount - we'd actually get some good talent running the country.

At $300k (PM) or ~$150k to $200k (MPs, depending on position) all we're getting is corporate-world flunkies in charge.

What is the incentive for a successful business man, lawyer, doctor, scientist, artist or academic to run for office then they could have the risk of making $150k / year (which is much less than they would in the private sector). Being a politician shouldn't be a charity job. FYI - $150k is peanuts.

___________________
- rabbit.joker [funny¿rabbit] | www.rabbitjoker.com |www.ddtt.org

Dark Dirty Tech Tribal. | Hands in air (trance) and feet on the floor (house).

the whole idea of government was for the common man to be able to run. Obviously that has not occurred in modern day. Perhaps if we changed the rules for financing campaigns it could happen again. Im sick of nothing but lawyers and professional politicians trying to make decisions on health care, the environment and other things they know nothing about. The salary is way too high unless we are actually paying an environment specialist to be environment minister.

quote:

Originally posted by Cyrus King Im sure if Courtney love suddenly became queen of england.. you would cringe. Its just a POSITION! How do you respect her as a PERSON??? How as a PERSON has she achieved something for canada. Not as the Queen.. but as an idividual without title. She didnt sacrifice anything to make canada better? She just sat in a throne all her life.

just because you either don't understand or don't like the rich British cultural traditions (monarchy included) that laid the foundations of this nation, doesn't mean the majority of Canadians feel the same way. The British and French have done much more for Canadian culture and identity than multiculturalism ever has or ever will. I really don't see the outright benefits of multiculturalism...other than it forces people to always compromise. And if you think that's a racist comment, you're wrong.

I really don't understand why you're so opposed to Canada maintaining symbolic ties to the British monarchy as a means to preserve that aspect of our idenitity. What has she ever done to you personally anyway?

___________________
"No offense, but you're stupid"

quote:

Originally posted by Dj Smitty20 just because you either don't understand or don't like the rich British cultural traditions (monarchy included) that laid the foundations of this nation, doesn't mean the majority of Canadians feel the same way. The British and French have done much more for Canadian culture and identity than multiculturalism ever has or ever will. I really don't see the outright benefits of multiculturalism...other than it forces people to always compromise. And if you think that's a racist comment, you're wrong. I really don't understand why you're so opposed to Canada maintaining symbolic ties to the British monarchy as a means to preserve that aspect of our idenitity. What has she ever done to you personally anyway?

You have obviously seen that i have a problem with monarcial systems. They are pointless in my eyes. I do respect the british traditions that have shaped the country i have grown to love....but i still see no point in glorifying this Queen. I hate KINGS AND QUEENS!!!!!!!!!

___________________
"This place isn't big enough for me to blow it up."
-MARCO V

I have a disregard for princesses. Especially the ones that think they are princesses who seem to frequent the toronto nightclub scene LOL