Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Main Forums > Chill Out Room > Male freedom of choice?
Pages (41): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
Psy-T
Melody Klein



Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Haifa

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
This is a bit of a contrived question, but I do not see how you would feasibly be able to require people to sign contracts regarding theirbody functions, ever. And as far as I could tell, yours and Distant's suggestion was that men would automatically be forfeit of all responsibility for a child when it was determined that the woman was pregnant and would have to sign a contract saying that he wished to financially support the child, as it was his own? Or was it that men are automatically responsible (along with the mother) unless they file for some sort of status where they don't have to be financially responsible if they don't want to be?


quote:
Originally posted by Psy-T
require some bureaocracy for planned pregnancy rather than for casual sex (and i don't mean only for the females either - if a male is interested in fathering a potential offspring from a random sexual encounter, then he must fill such a form too, and notify his potential partners, whereupon they either agree via signing it, or disagree via declining him as a sexual partner).

(i forgot to mention 'disagree via declining to sign his form')
quote:
Originally posted by Psy-T
how many women out there looking for some sexual fun are hoping to be impregnated as a result? not many, i'd say - yet if it happens despite whatever precautions are taken, how many of them are going to want to carry the child to term? enough for it to become seriously problematic. what responsibility should they take in such a case? staying true to their original intentions? or carrying it to term? the current default assumption is (imo) unfortunately the latter.


quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
Man, I really wish we could do that. Along with internet licenses. And stricter drivers license requirements. And television licenses. And clean water licenses. Sounds pretty easy to do: just set up several new ministries that regulate the licensing for everything people do in life. I don't know where you'll get the money for that, but I am sure that if you raised everybody's taxes by 50%, you might be able to get the job done.


that's another easy one, you get the money for pregnancy related bureaocracy by taking it from whatever budget is being raped to track down eloping fathers under the current scheme.

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
I didn't say that people who argued with it were cowards - people who turn away from their responsibilities are cowards though. None of you are illogical/weak(did I say that one?)/unreasonable/cowards - but how many of you have children out there you know about but are ignoring?


none, as far as i know, however regarding what you did or did not say:
quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
Perhaps this is where sexism comes into play yet again. Except it has more to do with how males view themselves. We are not just mobile seed pouches. We are not just alphas who wander from city to city, spreading our seed as though we are rarities within our species. Biologically and ecologically, humans are. not. built. this. way. We are not flowers or insects - we are sentient mammals who owe it to the rest of our species to carry through within our society the raising of specific children to the best of our ability. Questioning the "logic" in this does not make one strong or smart or reasonable, it makes one a coward and it makes one deny what he has been programmed not only by society, but by the very nature of his corporeal existence.


the people arguing with you are doing exactly that - questioning the aformentioned "logic".


___________________
People who own my ass: Citric Acid, Boomer187, Tribu, Sand Leaper,
Jackson, venomX, jamie, Renegade, Konjin, Akridrot, Miss Bliss.
Psy-T - Down The Rabbit Hole (400minute long acid set)

Old Post Feb-09-2007 23:29  Israel
Click Here to See the Profile for Psy-T Click here to Send Psy-T a Private Message Visit Psy-T's homepage! Add Psy-T to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Halcyon+On+On
Liebchen



Registered: Sep 2004
Location: midcoast

quote:
Originally posted by Psy-T
(i forgot to mention 'disagree via declining to sign his form')


You know, I don't exactly have the data, but as logical as prenuptial agreements are, I would say that they are criminally uncommon.

Just something to think about when considering human nature...

quote:
that's another easy one, you get the money for pregnancy related bureaocracy by taking it from whatever budget is being raped to track down eloping fathers under the current scheme.


Oh, and how much money is that? Do you know for a fact that it is enough? Because I sure don't, but my ignorance in the matter rarely outweighs my doubt.

quote:
the people arguing with you are doing exactly that - questioning the aformentioned "logic".


I think you are trying to derail this into some sort of match where we argue about what we said/didn't say, rather than the topic at hand. You think I really meant that people who question things are "weak"? Were you hurt by this or something? No, it's not logical. Very little of the law actually is. Yes, it's sexist. Yes, it's asymmetrical - good point. What you are suggesting as a resolution has far more potential to be abused though - or at least just as abused as the current system, except by the other gender. Getting people to sign contracts to approve of their guardianship of a child is something I very much doubt you will pull off successfully - even if you did succeed on a level, you would only be able to get cooperation from the class of society that is the least affected by financial support issues anyways. It would fail to benefit the people who actually needed it - a common affect of logical, symmetrical legislation.


___________________
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

Old Post Feb-09-2007 23:41 
Click Here to See the Profile for Halcyon+On+On Click here to Send Halcyon+On+On a Private Message Add Halcyon+On+On to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Lilith
Meowsies!



Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Maximum Security twilight home for cats

So, if we are to acknowledge the fact a lot of men are only out there for the fun rather than the consequences of making kids, perhaps it would be better off for everyone concerned if we make things like getting a vasectomy cheaper. Government subsidised sterilisation, your choice.
Works on dogs and cats, keeps the amount of stray and unwanted kittens and puppy's down quite effectively.

Who'd object to that?

Put your hand up!

Old Post Feb-10-2007 00:05 
Click Here to See the Profile for Lilith Click here to Send Lilith a Private Message Add Lilith to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Psy-T
Melody Klein



Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Haifa

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
You know, I don't exactly have the data, but as logical as prenuptial agreements are, I would say that they are criminally uncommon.

Just something to think about when considering human nature...


and what you're deriving from this is that pregnency-related agreements would likely be just as rare? suppose they will be - what would that lead to? and why do you feel the result will necessarily be bad?

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
Oh, and how much money is that? Do you know for a fact that it is enough? Because I sure don't, but my ignorance in the matter rarely outweighs my doubt.


can't say that i do, but my ignorance in this matter outweighs my doubt.

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
I think you are trying to derail this into some sort of match where we argue about what we said/didn't say, rather than the topic at hand. You think I really meant that people who question things are "weak"? Were you hurt by this or something? No, it's not logical. Very little of the law actually is. Yes, it's sexist. Yes, it's asymmetrical - good point.


i was just discussing this 'tactic' in the pdd the other day, you should check out the thread in question (it's called The Pie-Man Argument or something like that), in which i explained precisely why i use it.

quote:
Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
What you are suggesting as a resolution has far more potential to be abused though - or at least just as abused as the current system, except by the other gender. Getting people to sign contracts to approve of their guardianship of a child is something I very much doubt you will pull off successfully - even if you did succeed on a level, you would only be able to get cooperation from the class of society that is the least affected by financial support issues anyways. It would fail to benefit the people who actually needed it - a common affect of logical, symmetrical legislation.


it seems you're suggesting that the only people who desire to become fathers are well off. if so, reconsider.

it also seems you're still misunderstanding the sort of agreements being proposed here - their authority does not end with the financial arrangements, and in most cases, they'd be used to 'clinch' parenthood, and largely prevent the whole need for direct financial support.


___________________
People who own my ass: Citric Acid, Boomer187, Tribu, Sand Leaper,
Jackson, venomX, jamie, Renegade, Konjin, Akridrot, Miss Bliss.
Psy-T - Down The Rabbit Hole (400minute long acid set)

Old Post Feb-10-2007 00:16  Israel
Click Here to See the Profile for Psy-T Click here to Send Psy-T a Private Message Visit Psy-T's homepage! Add Psy-T to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Sand Leaper
Tension hunter



Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Oslo, Norway

quote:
Originally posted by Lilith
So, if we are to acknowledge the fact a lot of men are only out there for the fun rather than the consequences of making kids, perhaps it would be better off for everyone concerned if we make things like getting a vasectomy cheaper. Government subsidised sterilisation, your choice.
Works on dogs and cats, keeps the amount of stray and unwanted kittens and puppy's down quite effectively.

Who'd object to that?

Put your hand up!


I'm pretty sure the home secretary of Japan would have a thing or two to say about that..


___________________
"Wenn du dich zum Untergrund zählst, reicht es nicht, es nur zu sagen. Du musst auch viel graben, um es zu werden."

Old Post Feb-10-2007 00:18  Norway
Click Here to See the Profile for Sand Leaper Click here to Send Sand Leaper a Private Message Add Sand Leaper to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Psy-T
Melody Klein



Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Haifa

quote:
Originally posted by Lilith
So, if we are to acknowledge the fact a lot of men and women are only out there for the fun rather than the consequences of making kids, perhaps it would be better off for everyone concerned if we make things like getting a vasectomy cheaper. Government subsidised sterilisation, your choice.
Works on dogs and cats, keeps the amount of stray and unwanted kittens and puppy's down quite effectively.

Who'd object to that?

Put your hand up!


*cough*


p.s. i'd have no significant objections to not being able to impregnate as long as everything else keeps fuctioning as it should and i get to keep some seman stored away for use in case i decide to become a father at some point.


___________________
People who own my ass: Citric Acid, Boomer187, Tribu, Sand Leaper,
Jackson, venomX, jamie, Renegade, Konjin, Akridrot, Miss Bliss.
Psy-T - Down The Rabbit Hole (400minute long acid set)

Old Post Feb-10-2007 00:20  Israel
Click Here to See the Profile for Psy-T Click here to Send Psy-T a Private Message Visit Psy-T's homepage! Add Psy-T to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Silky Johnson
International Playa Hater



Registered: Nov 2003
Location:

Vasectomies are reversible, I'm pretty sure.

Old Post Feb-10-2007 00:26 
Click Here to See the Profile for Silky Johnson Click here to Send Silky Johnson a Private Message Add Silky Johnson to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
all-nite-freak




Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Moved from death Row to TA Paris Hillton Prison

quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
Vasectomies are reversible, I'm pretty sure.


so are condoms!

Old Post Feb-10-2007 00:31 
Click Here to See the Profile for all-nite-freak Click here to Send all-nite-freak a Private Message Add all-nite-freak to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Silky Johnson
International Playa Hater



Registered: Nov 2003
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by all-nite-freak
so are condoms!





LOL...so wrong.

Old Post Feb-10-2007 00:32 
Click Here to See the Profile for Silky Johnson Click here to Send Silky Johnson a Private Message Add Silky Johnson to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Lilith
Meowsies!



Registered: Nov 2000
Location: Maximum Security twilight home for cats

quote:
Originally posted by Sand Leaper
I'm pretty sure the home secretary of Japan would have a thing or two to say about that..

Elaborate

Very good, Psy-T has the right idea.
He can have his fun and all the irresponsible behaviour he wants without the repercussions of ending up with someone nailing him down for 18years under 'economic tyranny' for forgetting the condom or her forgetting the pill or whatever.

So, youre of breedin' age son. Congratulations
Go down the government funded sperm bank, make your deposit and then it's off to the doc for a bit of government funded snip and away we go in life. Should you meet a lady one day you want to procreate with, then you go down and collect some of that deposit and gleefully impregnate her.

Accident and irresponsibility insurance taken care of for life.

As for the rest of you who arent going to undertake this kind of insurance policy, sorry, same old rules apply, you make it, you either break it or pay for it.
It is the very least we can do for each other as a species to ensure kids are kept at least clothes, school, housed and fed.
With any luck they won't be arseholes like their parents.

Old Post Feb-10-2007 00:35 
Click Here to See the Profile for Lilith Click here to Send Lilith a Private Message Add Lilith to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Sand Leaper
Tension hunter



Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Oslo, Norway

quote:
Originally posted by Lilith
Elaborate


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/as...fic/6309405.stm


___________________
"Wenn du dich zum Untergrund zählst, reicht es nicht, es nur zu sagen. Du musst auch viel graben, um es zu werden."

Old Post Feb-10-2007 00:39  Norway
Click Here to See the Profile for Sand Leaper Click here to Send Sand Leaper a Private Message Add Sand Leaper to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Sand Leaper
Tension hunter



Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Oslo, Norway

quote:
Originally posted by Lilith
Why?
He's an insensitive clod I'll give him that but I'm sure he'd be interested in some form of planned pregnacy programs which would benifit the wellbeing and birth rates.
No point bringing kids into the world if you can't look after them.


My guess is that ideas towards planned parenthood isn't high up on your list of priorities when your country has more retired people than young people. Particularly not an idea that involves stripping men of their ability to reproduce.


___________________
"Wenn du dich zum Untergrund zählst, reicht es nicht, es nur zu sagen. Du musst auch viel graben, um es zu werden."

Old Post Feb-10-2007 00:47  Norway
Click Here to See the Profile for Sand Leaper Click here to Send Sand Leaper a Private Message Add Sand Leaper to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Main Forums > Chill Out Room > Male freedom of choice?
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (41): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackPls id this track from a robert gitelman set [2004] [1]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackPassive Resistance - Water Base [2003]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 16:40.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!