Originally posted by jennypie
I don't see how anything he said was idiotic. Makes more sense and is a lot more rational than the typical shit that most other people spew on the subject.
quote:
Originally posted by shevchenko135
lol proven? hahahahahaha, Religious people believe in something that happened a few thousand years ago, you believe in something that happened 6 billion years ago. God or no God, who's been fooled into believing now.
quote:
Originally posted by shevchenko135
Never did I say I believed that. I make my own truth because that's all you can do in this sick world we live in. I refuse to be a part of something or an idea just because that's what the general public thinks, aside of supposed "proof" of such theories. Until I see a youtube video of some anti-matter exploding and creating the universe...
This tool is king among idiots.
He "makes his own truth?" what the fuck does that even mean? He wants it confirmed by You Tube first? LOL
Something is either true or it is not--something cannot be scientifically true for one person and not true for another.
Jan-31-2009 00:30
Silky Johnson
International Playa Hater
Registered: Nov 2003
Location:
I don't see what's wrong with that. Perception is everything.
And you've obviously taken his Youtube comment too literally. He's just making a point about what we know as "truth", and how time and time again that "truth" has been disproved as new "evidence" emerges.
Jan-31-2009 00:32
evil_cookie
indifferent
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto
quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
I don't see what's wrong with that. Perception is everything.
And you've obviously taken his Youtube comment too literally.
Perception belongs to the realm of subjectivism.
Observational consensus--the scientific method--belongs to the realm of objectivism.
so no, everything is not perception.
Jan-31-2009 00:34
Yohan
Champion of Deep&Nu-disco
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Kitchener, Ont, Soviet Canuckistan
quote:
Originally posted by evil_cookie
Something is either true or it is not--something cannot be scientifically true for one person and not true for another.
of course it can
example
two scientists observe same occurence happening, but each have different opinions to how that occurence happen.
both can prove (or at least theorize) and it makes valid sense from scientific method POV
Originally posted by chinamon
not true. i say "ugh"
but i am a tranny.
quote:
Originally posted by kotsy
lol colour me retarded
Jan-31-2009 00:34
evil_cookie
indifferent
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto
quote:
Originally posted by Yohan
of course it can
example
two scientists observe same occurence happening, but each have different opinions to how that occurence happen.
both can prove (or at least theorize) and it makes valid sense from scientific method POV
so which scientist is right?
You're confused Yohan.
The yielded results they have come to they have agreed on--there is no opinion. However, each scientist can certainly hypothesis about how "x" came to be. But, it cannot, and does not negate the fact that "x" is true.
Jan-31-2009 00:37
Silky Johnson
International Playa Hater
Registered: Nov 2003
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by evil_cookie
Perception belongs to the realm of subjectivism.
Observational consensus--the scientific method--belongs to the realm of objectivism.
so no, everything is not perception.
Whatever dude, there's no point talking to a person who obviously can't see the forest for the trees.
Jan-31-2009 00:38
Silky Johnson
International Playa Hater
Registered: Nov 2003
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by evil_cookie
You're confused Yohan.
The yielded results they have come to they have agreed on--there is no opinion. However, each scientist can certainly hypothesis about how "x" came to be. But, it cannot, and does not negate the fact that "x" is true.
So you're saying that truth is absolute? Cause that sounds pretty stupid to me.
Jan-31-2009 00:40
evil_cookie
indifferent
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto
quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
So you're saying that truth is absolute? Cause that sounds pretty stupid to me.
If you care to read my previous, more detailed post, you'd see that I'd be the last person to make such a silly claim.
Jan-31-2009 00:42
Silky Johnson
International Playa Hater
Registered: Nov 2003
Location:
No, I don't care to read your post. I just wanted to point out that you've misinterpreted stevechenko's posts.
Jan-31-2009 00:45
evil_cookie
indifferent
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto
quote:
Originally posted by jennypie
No, I don't care to read your post. I just wanted to point out that you've misinterpreted stevechenko's posts.
That obviously can't be the case--because I have shown how his arguments are utterly wrong. And all you've said is "whatever dude."
Jan-31-2009 00:47
Silky Johnson
International Playa Hater
Registered: Nov 2003
Location:
Cool. You have to to be right all the time, and there's nothing wrong with that. I just don't like engaging in conversation with people like you.
Jan-31-2009 00:53
Skipper
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2002
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by evil_cookie
Fellow TA's I am pleased to announce that we have a new village idiot amongst us.
