|
| quote: | Originally posted by daves
haha i wonder if this Canadian Plastics Industry Association-funded study would have seen the light of day if it produced anything other than results that helped to encourage the purchase of more plastics? |
OK, but here's the real question: Who has funded a study that you would consider to be independent?
On the one hand you're looking at studies from the plastics industry, and on the other hand you're looking at studies (actually, more like pure rhetoric) from environmentalists and anti-corporate types who really hate plastics. I don't even know why anybody would get so emotional over plastics, but I'm not joking, I've met them. Remember, these are the same people who originally spread the still-popular but patently false information about popular plastic products leaching into food, and other such idiocy. You should be assigning the same credibility to an industry-funded study as you would to an NGO.
I see from this post and many previous ones that you're quite fond of the genetic fallacy (i.e. this argument or data lacks credibility because it comes from a source I consider to be biased). It's really not a particularly constructive or enlightened way of thinking.
___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here
|