)but who is to say that we aren't puppets?

we are all puppets to some degree and nobody is truly free. we all have constraints and obligations to the 'global' economy and so long as the U.S. will use iraq as an export nation how will they benefit from such an arrangement?

money is your master...live it and learn it, because without money 95% of all the world's problems would be solved (thus introducing another 34095094850 problems )

___________________


You need people like me!!! You need people like me so you can point your fucking fingers, and say 'that's the bad guy!' So, what dat make you? Good? You're not good; you just know how to hide. Howda lie. Me, I don't have that problem.

Help Fight Disease TA United Research Team

The results of this war have sickened me further. I cannot stand Bush anymore and his disgusting excuse of an administration.

All these pro-war people keep repeating the notion that freedom will come to these people and it is better than Husseins regime in power. Yet the results of this war have put a worse people into an even more worse state. Yes... Hussein is gone... and that is good... but for 4000 lives..... and probably more in the near future? I dont think that was worth it.

Again.... i thinkthe US.... as John Smith put it are going to suffer the unfortunate consequences by alot of pissed off people in this world. Im sure that if i witnessed my family blown to bits or mowed down by US troops for speaking out loud that i would take some sort of action. I wouldnt give a fuck.

___________________
"This place isn't big enough for me to blow it up."
-MARCO V

yeah the fault is that of dubYA...because it directly and solely on his hands!

it's unfortunate that people hate americans now solely because of one man. sure, i think dubYA is a terrorist in his own way...but if the US starts to get targetted (which they will...just look at the car bombing in saudi recently) then those responsible killing innocent americans are no just as bad as dubYA.

one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter...and in this world opinion is relative, everybody has their own opinion and to each individual that other man's opinion reeks of shit!

___________________


You need people like me!!! You need people like me so you can point your fucking fingers, and say 'that's the bad guy!' So, what dat make you? Good? You're not good; you just know how to hide. Howda lie. Me, I don't have that problem.

Help Fight Disease TA United Research Team

quote:

Originally posted by marcus82 i haven't been around long enough in these forums to formulate an opinion on the posters...but IMO you can never accurately account for deaths in this gulf war. why do you ask? in my opinion this war was uncoventional to say the least, most of iraqi army were not in uniformed and thus you can not adequately disseminate between actual civilian deaths vs iraqi army deaths. im not pro war, but i do not condone the press handling of the matter either. i have become very cynical about source data from many 'credible' sources because IMO information and data are so easily manipulated on both sides of the spectrum. in the end people died and it's is a shame on both sides...

I agree, but i believe that the deaths are probably UNDERSTATED, rather than overstated, due to the state of things in iraq right now, i doubt everyone is accounted for. the site i quoted uses minimum and maximum figures, verified from 3 major news sources. true, it's not perfectly accurate, but we can be reasonably sure that between 3 and 4 thousand iraqis lie dead.

quote:

Originally posted by marcus82 we really need to start showing war and other attrocities like suicides bombings or bombings in general (including 'precision strikes') on a individual level...who would want to kills after they see 3 000 dead (not refering to any persons or events) and their dependents suffer. would you kill someone if you had to see their family suffer over and voer? multiply that by 3 000 times and maybe, just maybe we can realize that we are all damn human, we all bleed, we all dies, we all fear, but we all love in the end.

amen. unfortunately, american media doesn't like to show these images, it brings down the pro war side in the polls, and thus Bush's popularity. conversely, we were bombarded over and over again with images of the WTC towers falling, so we would never forget it.

quote:

LASTLY, NEVER EVER SAY THE 'US'...it's not the US...it's the BUSH GOV'T, and the problem with that is that radicals use 'US' interchangably with a democratically elected (if bush was elected) gov't which changes every 4-8 years. use BUSH gov't...cuz we all know it's bush's war mongering.

well.. i admit that it is the bush govt or rather the PNAC which controls him. however, it is the american peoples complicity, that implicates them in this. and in the end, the terrorists will not retalliate against bush and cheney(i'm sure they would if they could), the victimes will be "innocent" people in LA, Chicago, Boston, Texas or London, Sydney, or Toronto.

We all need to stop this senseless violence, lest it spiral into something we can never quell.

___________________

Visit my site Antiwar Homepage

quote:

Originally posted by occrider See ... no flame Wow it's been a while since there has been a serious flame war in this forum.

Melech Mike hasn't been posting.....lol

Just kidding Mike.

quote:

Originally posted by JohnSmith well, the US has only proven that it only understands one thing, violence, and i guess that is what the next wave of antiwar protestors will have to resort to to stop future agression.

I hope you're not serious about that. That would make the anit-war protestors as hypocritical as the US gov; Violence for peace.

___________________
http://www.discoboomer.com/forums/

quote:

Originally posted by JohnSmith amen. unfortunately, american media doesn't like to show these images, it brings down the pro war side in the polls, and thus Bush's popularity. conversely, we were bombarded over and over again with images of the WTC towers falling, so we would never forget it.

very true, but what r u doin watching CNN?

the responsibility is on use to disseminate fact from fiction...and realize bias that exist in media.

CNN is perhaps entertaining at best (like WWE entertaining).

im glad alot of american youth are realizing this now...perhaps they can help shape the world to be a better place then it is.

___________________


You need people like me!!! You need people like me so you can point your fucking fingers, and say 'that's the bad guy!' So, what dat make you? Good? You're not good; you just know how to hide. Howda lie. Me, I don't have that problem.

Help Fight Disease TA United Research Team

quote:

Originally posted by DaveSaenz I hope you're not serious about that. That would make the anit-war protestors as hypocritical as the US gov; Violence for peace.

didn't you read what i wrote after?

quote:

see? the cycle? in northern ireland, in palestine, even in the brother and sister fighting? someone has to stop it. when?

i was trying to illustrate the folly of this, and that we cannot continue the cycle of violence.

___________________

Visit my site Antiwar Homepage

- Well Marcus, some americans youth, are switching from CNN to Foxnews, which is 100000000000000000000000000000000000000x worst...

OI!

that news is crap...i saw it one time on fox29 (in buffalo)...horrid.

i think naked news provides better 'coverage' than fox or cnn (LOL...sorry bad joke)!

___________________


You need people like me!!! You need people like me so you can point your fucking fingers, and say 'that's the bad guy!' So, what dat make you? Good? You're not good; you just know how to hide. Howda lie. Me, I don't have that problem.

Help Fight Disease TA United Research Team

quote:

Originally posted by Vesa This account is just the opposite of the American carelessness in Iraq. Perhaps the American troops got insufficient training and briefing before invading Iraq, so they couldn't hold fire long enough in confusing situations.

wow, good post (*edit* i put article...meant post)

that is very good point about inadequate combat training. remember whent he tank on the bridge by the palestine hotel fired at the camera crew on the balcony of one of the floors? as well as al-jaezera and abu dhabi? perhaps this are just few illustrations of 'mistaken' identity.

___________________


You need people like me!!! You need people like me so you can point your fucking fingers, and say 'that's the bad guy!' So, what dat make you? Good? You're not good; you just know how to hide. Howda lie. Me, I don't have that problem.

Help Fight Disease TA United Research Team

quote:

Originally posted by Vesa The saddest thing is that many of the Iraqi deaths were obviously unnecessary. Before the war there was lots of talk about minimizing civilian casualties, but it seems that those intentions were not always realized.

I disagree ... I think minimizing civilian casualties was a high priority. Considering that civilian casualties in the first gulf war were estimated to be as high as 35,000 civilians:

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/gu.../facts/gulfwar/

I think that given that this is an actual invasion of the country, that the civilian casualties were less than I expected them to be. Yes there are going to be a few isolated incidents of soldiers taking things too far (tank firing on Palestine hotel) but I think that minimizing civilian objectives was a very high priority in the war planning.

quote:

- The Shock & Awe bombing stategy was IMO an unnecessary military experiment, intended mainly to get data about the US bombing capability in a real situation. Another goal was to demoralize the Iraqi Special Republican Guards in charge of the defense of Baghdad, but there was little evidence of this particular strategy being the main factor which led to surrenders of Iraqi troops. Instead, a few missiles missed their targets, and killed dozens of civilians, proving the irresponsibility of using precision-guided missiles to destroy symbolic-only targets in the middle of residential areas.

I wouldn't call it an unnecessary military experiment. More like a failed strategy based upon analyses of the Iraqi army. If it had worked countless of lives could have been saved as was the intent of the strategy. I think it was worthy of an attempt since many people at the time did predict the Iraqi army to collapse.

quote:

- Cluster bombing. This was the most irresponsible action of all. The Iraqi troops were known to have little or no coherent war command, so the cluster bombing was not essential for the military end result. The only motive was to minimize American military casualties at the expense of hundreds of Iraqi civilian casualties. There's little military nobility in blowing up Iraqi women and children just to potentially save a few American soldiers. Especially when the goal of the operation was said to be freeing Iraqi civilians from tyranny.

The cluster bombs of the 80s are not the same cluster bombs today. The cluster munitions dropped were anti-ARMOR cluster munitions. More specifically CBU-97 Sensor Fuzed weapons:

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/dumb/cbu-97.htm

These weapons release 10 submunitions around the target area which then rely upon INFRARED SEEKERS to guide individual bomblets to hit armored targets. They were dropped on armor columns and are the equivalent to attacking an armor column with 10 jets dropping regular bombs. Yes there is the potential for a few duds to not fire and injure civilians, however there is just as much of a chance for a regular bomb to be a dud.

quote:

- Many Iraqi conscripts were killed before they had a chance to surrender. Speed of advance was a military motivation which overrided careful planning to not engage Iraqi conscripts unnecessarily. The Iraqi military losses have been rumoured to be around 10,000, and may turn out to be the most shameful aspect of the American invasion.

Hmmmm so we should shoot a couple bullets at them and wait 15 minutes to see if they surrender, then shoot even more bullets at them and wait another 15 mintues to see if they surrender, etc.? Many many leaflets were dropped advising Iraqi combatants to surrender and how they should surrender. Those that didn't either A) Did not want to surrender ... or B) Could not surrender because they would be shot. In either case, what can you do? It's unfortunate in the latter case but there's no magic bullet that homes in on officers ..

Careful planning to NOT engage the Iraqi army??? Ay yay yay talk about monday morning quarterbacking. Look, the US army wasn't running around the desert looking to engage every single Iraqi they could find. They went from point A to point B to secure objective C and engaged any threats in their path! What are they going to do? Go around the enemy and leave whole intact units to harass the flanks or supply lines? What a revolutionary military doctrine! I think the french used that one in WW2 (just kidding). The speed of the invasion was the reason why it was such an unmitigated success. The front lines moved so rapidly that the Iraqi commanders had no situational awareness and could not mount a cohesive resistance.

quote:

- American indiscriminate fire killed many civilians who happened to be nearby when American troops were engaged by small groups of Arab volunteers. Women, children and grandpas who were walking by, or driving in cars were shot without any apparent reason. This hints to non-professionalism, racism ("let's kill them, they are only Arabs") and naivety of American soldiers. There were many reports by the embedded journalists about trigger-happy Americans. The US military command may be ultimately responsible for these civilian deaths because they didn't strictly limit the rules of engagement. This is in huge contrast to some previous wars where the American military had a high level of professionalism, and genuine concern for minimizing unnecessary casualties: http://www.snipersparadise.com/articles/operatio.htm This account is just the opposite of the American carelessness in Iraq. Perhaps the American troops got insufficient training and briefing before invading Iraq, so they couldn't hold fire long enough in confusing situations.

War is hell ... yes there are going to be some mistakes made and there are going to be shites that are overexcessive in every country. There were strict rules of engagement as demonstrated by the military checkpoints death. Wave to stop ... shoot warning shots in the air ... fire at engine block ... fire at individuals. I think that you are incorrect in labelling the 250,000+ soldiers as being racist and that avoiding civilian casualties was not a major objective for the military command.

___________________
Retro ...

Iraqi Civilian Deaths? sure, lets talk iraqi civilian deaths...

http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast...main/index.html

quote:

MAHAWIL, Iraq (CNN) -- The head of an Iraqi forensic team said Wednesday he expects to find as many as 15,000 bodies buried at mass graves about 55 miles (90 kilometers) south of Baghdad. Hundreds of relatives of missing Iraqis gathered at the site in Mahawil, seeking to find out the fate of their loved ones. The forensic team has uncovered 1,500 bodies so far, identifying only a fraction of them. (Gallery: Images from Mahawil, On the Scene: Jane Arraf) The bodies are mostly of Iraqi Shiites who died in an uprising against Saddam Hussein following the 1991 Persian Gulf War, according to Human Rights Watch spokesman Peter Bouckaert and local officials. Bouckaert said the crude means of uncovering the bodies -- with a bulldozer -- was destroying evidence from the burials. He cited the example of an Iraqi identity document, with its number still intact, blowing away in the wind. "This little piece of information could actually have led a family to recover the skeleton of their relative, but because it's blown away from this pile -- as we see stuff blowing around all over the place -- that family probably won't have the answer they seek here today," he said. Touring the site Wednesday, Ahmad Chalabi, head of the opposition Iraqi National Congress, said the mass grave was evidence supporting the U.S.-led military action to remove Saddam from power.

___________________
c o n : f u s e d