 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
-=M=-
Feelin' Bricky?

Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Melbourne, Aus
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by lethal
My main beef with the film is that even if itsa a sequel it should still be a stand alone film!! In any series of movies, books, tv, whatever... each "episode" should be a story in itself, sure theres an overlaying story but something should happen in EACH story.... example: Lord Of The Rings - each story is fairly stand alone its not neccesary to see the first one to enjoy the second one, and you dont have to see the third one to finish the second one..... its just not how you do a series...... especially when you having a 6 month gap between releasing the flicks!!!
Thats my main beef with the film!!! Oh that and all that predeterminism crap, its such a fuckin cop out theory its not funny!!!
I await flamage!!!  |
i agree and disagree on the whole "stand alone" factor with sequals, as it does apply to movies such as Star Wars amongst the biggest names, however it also doesnt apply as we have seen in the CLASSIC Back to the future set which actually depends on the previous movies to tell the beginning of the storyline
Matrix was awesome, while it seemed that you know, everything apart from the start was pure action sequences, you must have failed to see the whole way that they developed the plot... i dont want to put any spoilers in this but im sure if you saw it a second time you would spot the development and twists and turns it takes, and all the hints to do with a certain "program"... i reckon that whole concept ruled, remember what you discover about the oracle?
|
|
May-17-2003 07:41
|
|
|
 |
 |
Hybrid Junkie
Running Down The Way Up

Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Melbourne
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by lethal
example: Lord Of The Rings - each story is fairly stand alone its not neccesary to see the first one to enjoy the second one, and you dont have to see the third one to finish the second one..... |
Big "errrrrmmmmmm"
The lord of the rings was written as one novel with 3 "books" but they were meant moreso as sorta large chapters.
It is ONE story, it wasn't meant to be a series, or seperated from the whole. It is NOT 3 novels or 3 stories.
Sorry about your point but lord of the rings was probably the worst example, peter jackson and the film makers have made the FILMS relatively stand alone, because A) some idiots won't watch the entire series, B) the movie standalone would be 9 hrs or something ridiculous , and C) because of the wait in between movies.
In an idealistic world, free of budget, marketing, idiots who don't understand the context... it WOULD be an entire film.
So...err...yeah.. 
And you need to look at the big picture, matrix 1 was an introduction, matrix 2 gives you the low down on what the entire matrix really is and how it operates (internally), and what the survivors are like (their society blah blah), and matrix 3 will be the conclusion/resolution.
There were soo many hints in the first one that there was going to be a sequel, and that it was NOT a standalone story (it ends with neo saying it continues ("I'm not saying that this is how it's going to end, I'm saying that this is how it's goiung to begin" or something) and the 2nd one has heaappss of hints (well blatnatly obvious onez) that the story is developing (a certain evolution happening? )
I didn't think the plot was AMAAZZINNG but it beats the pants off most of the tripe going around in ACTION/SCI-FI movies recently.
But yeah, that dancing scene was fucking pointless.
Not a hardcore matrix fan, but I like to enjoy things, and go in with an open mind, I didn't expect a life changing experience, and I didn't get it, but was pleasantly suprised with a lot of the movie.
I hate people which don't look at the context, for example I rmember when godzilla came out, soooo many people dissed it saying "It was shit, it wsa just this big monster destroying the city, and stupid explosions and stuff" umm HELLO IT WAS ABOUT A FUCKING MONSTER DESTROYING THE CITY!!!!! anyone seen the original...
basically, if you don't want to see a movie about a monster destroying a city why the fuck would you go see it? You can't have expectations for something which is NOT going to happen. I don't see a chic flick expecting an in depth plot or wicked martial arts....I mean really.
I thought godzilla was allright, BECAUSE I expected a movie about a monster destroying a city.
Ffs, some people just aren't happy if things aren't want they want them to be. No-one likes change?
Free Glitter pens for anyone who actually read all that
___________________
Needing a reason for being stuck in this seemingly demeaning whirlwind of ride with you
|
|
May-17-2003 07:57
|
|
|
 |
 |
lethal
Meh.......

Registered: May 2003
Location: Sydney, OZ
|
|
|
M : i did get all the storyline twists and plots changes, and all the things leading toward the third one but too me it just wasnt a satisfying conlusion to the film. In MY opinion films like this need some sort of confilct resolution. Perfect example for me is the Lord of the rings movies (i probably should have mentioned i was talking about the film version of LOTR not the book - cause yes i know the book is 1 volume with 3 chapters, etc....) each film has its own unique story, with character development, a strong hint to the future sequel(s), and a big satisfying battle between good and evil at the end, where evil suffers a setback, and we all are left feeling happy and satisfied that the world is as it should be...... (examples destroying the first death star in star wars IV, escaping from the city in the sky in episode V, and destroying the second death star, and the emperor in episode VI...... see where im leading here?? )
Perhaps i am a bit of a sucker for the big finale battle that hollywood loves to give us, but im sorry the end of the matrix just did not leave me fullfilled. Thats my only beef with the film, it needs some cataclysmic event to end, even if it showed us the counterattack or gave us something........
Anywayz im glad you boys enjoyed it..... if everyone thought the same, itd be a very boring world..... bring on the arguing!!!!  
___________________
Never hold your farts in!!!
They travel up your spine into your brain
and that where you get shit ideas from!!!
|
|
May-17-2003 11:24
|
|
|
 |
 |
-=M=-
Feelin' Bricky?

Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Melbourne, Aus
|
|
|
/me grabs himself a glitter pen
| quote: | Originally posted by lethal
M : i did get all the storyline twists and plots changes, and all the things leading toward the third one but too me it just wasnt a satisfying conlusion to the film. In MY opinion films like this need some sort of confilct resolution. Perfect example for me is the Lord of the rings movies (i probably should have mentioned i was talking about the film version of LOTR not the book - cause yes i know the book is 1 volume with 3 chapters, etc....) each film has its own unique story, with character development, a strong hint to the future sequel(s), and a big satisfying battle between good and evil at the end, where evil suffers a setback, and we all are left feeling happy and satisfied that the world is as it should be...... (examples destroying the first death star in star wars IV, escaping from the city in the sky in episode V, and destroying the second death star, and the emperor in episode VI...... see where im leading here?? )
|
OMFG OMFG OMFG OMFG
are you being serious with the LOTR where they make each film a unique story and a conclusive ending??? the first one ended with the hobbits being kidnapped and frodo and sam setting off, and the second one finished with frodo and sam setting off again, its an awesome movie in all but what youre saying is that all sagas have to have a conclusive ending, well guess what, a conclusive ending isnt defined at having a major battle toward of the end and a small aftermath and cut scene afterwards, that is what you call the climax and anti climax of a film. if you wanna see good climaxes and anti-climaxes you go see movies like Terminator or any horror flick/suspense flick/thriller, movies like LOTR Matrix Back To the Future etc that usually run in sagas really depend on an inconclusive ending so that viewers will be intregued or wanting more but still feeling satisfied after the whole ordeal.... thats how LOTR Matrix and to a lesser extent Harry Potter have been produced
they make the films with extended breaks in between so that fans of the films want to know what happens next. LOTR has been really smart about this coz they have left pecisely 1 year and release it after xmas so that everyone will be on holidays and everyone will know what date it will be released.
every movie has a climax towards the end, if you dont want to get involved in a set of movies you know will be depending on a sequal then theres a simple solution:
DONT GO
if your thing is a crappy b grade movie with no original plot or storyline, dont go to one that is made out to be a masterpiece by critics expecting something you can watch without wanting to get into the storyline
i could argue all day, but i wont, im gonna go have a ciggy
[Connery] I cant remember quite how the joke ends but your mother's a whore [/Connery]
|
|
May-17-2003 12:24
|
|
|
 |
 |
Master_Yoda
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
|
|
May-17-2003 12:39
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:27.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|