 |
|
|
|
 |
melech_mike
Kill Arafat Alliance

Registered: Feb 2001
Location: Toronto (Thornhill)
|
|
I love how it's always 'Sharon' that we concentrate our efforts on.
We have yet to see Abu Mazen do anything. Why isn't everyone weary about this supposedly 'new guy’? He has yet to prove himself to be that, 'peace desiring; peace loving man', people make him out to be.
The PLO has yet to produce any genuine diplomat in all its existence.
Let's have a look onto what we know about Abu Mazen:
In describing Abu Mazen's credentials for a crackdown on terror, Associated Press has in the past echoed the major media in declaring that he is "an outspoken critic of attacks on Israelis by Palestinian militants."
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm...srael_explosion
One gets the sense the new leader emerged from a dovish, non-violent Palestinian camp. Indeed, in a celebrated November 2002 speech, Abu Mazen earned the title of moderate by stating: "We cannot reach our goal through the use of force." He later, however, carefully qualified his statement, advocating ongoing violence against Israelis living over the Green Line and clarifying that "we didn't say we would stop the armed struggle. We said that the militarization of the Intifada should stop... there is no option but to stop it for a year and it won't be perceived as caving in on our side."
http://www.themedialine.org/news/ne...asp?NewsID=1550
These unequivocally hostile Abu Mazen statements were until recently posted on the IDF's official web site to illustrate terror support from the Palestinian leadership. As noted by Haaretz, they were removed from the site just a short while ago, in an apparent effort to grant Abu Mazen legitimacy during his rise to power.
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/p...l?itemNo=272308
The New York Times reports that Israeli officials have gathered what they call extreme statements made by Abu Mazen over the years, but have held the material in reserve while they judge his performance.
The IDF seemingly agrees with Washington that Abu Mazen is the best of many bad options to replace Arafat in the Palestinian leadership. But for the record, here's some background:
- In 1964, Abu Mazen was one of the original founders of the PLO/Fatah (itself the father of modern terrorism), and is presently head of the PLO's executive committee.
- Abu Mazen supports the Palestinian right of refugee return, a key reason for the failure of the Oslo Accords which he himself negotiated.
http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?P...a=sr&ID=SR00501
- Important Jewish groups, including the American Jewish Committee, the Simon Wiesenthal Center, and the Zionist Organization of America, have criticized Abu Mazen for his Holocaust-denying 1983 book, "The Other Side: The Secret Relationship between Nazism and the Zionist Movement." (see HonestReporting critique at:
http://www.honestreporting.com/arti...me_Minister.asp)
- Abbas is widely perceived by Palestinians as corrupt, illustrated by his construction of a lavish $1.5 million villa in a poverty-stricken area of Gaza.
- Finally, we recall that Abu Mazen was never elected to public office, but rather appointed directly by Arafat. This was clearly not what President Bush had in mind when declaring last June: "I call on the Palestinian people to elect new leaders, leaders not compromised by terror. I call upon them to build a practicing democracy."
Do we not at all worry that this peace plan will fail at the hands of Abu Mazen? There is more to whether or not this document will be successfully achieved than just the actions of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and the State of Israel!
___________________
Signature Suspended as it was deemed offensive.
|
|
May-27-2003 23:54
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
ChavezHype
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
|
|
|
As known in Spain from Basque issues... the process is ongoing. There will be a Palestinian state, eventually. However it will not satisfy anyone and now we're back to square one again.
Will there be peace? It depends on how low the level of satisfaction is. The very same hatred will come from both sides. IF Israel does get rid of its settlements in the occupied lands (all of them hopefully). Gives all the west bank and gaza. Then they have done their part, simple. If from there on in terrorism is still strong against Israel, then the rest of the world will eventually find out that the problem never really was that Israel took the land away, it was that Palestinians never accepted a Jewish state in lands which were owned by the british in the first place. All leaders are corrupt, politics is trash. If it weren't for politics, then it would be so much easier to get along... simply knowing each other. We're all really the same. No one really wants to talk, its all bs. Sharon and Abbas. And especially Arafat because, after all, all of the west bank and gaza were offered to him at the Oslo accord, yet he would not accept it. It's too bad Palestine never had a Yitzak Rabin at the time.
|
|
Jun-02-2003 02:46
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:28.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|