 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
JohnSmith
Agent Smith

Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Kamloops
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by pumavisor808
I prefer the denon because of the looping and multi track from one cd abilities, it is also cheaper than the 1000's or the new 1000mk2.
|
really? i thought they were more expensive. how much did you get yours for?
| quote: | Originally posted by pumavisor808
As for doing a whole set from one player...I was just saying you could do it... not that I would... I guess if you had your it all set up... say 3 or 4 cd's with your songs planned out, you could do...But I haven't actually done it yet... If I get a chance maybe I'll record a mix with just one player to see how it comes out...
|
i'd like to hear that. I'm sure it might be a useful feature maybe for a top 40 or wedding DJ that doesn't have to beatmatch and find cues, but for a trance DJ i doubt it would be possible to record a good set with it.
| quote: | Originally posted by pumavisor808
As for the pioneer cdj100... it bores me...If I was in the position to add to an existing turntable setup, I would go w/ one denon or one pioneer cdj1000 over 2 cdj100's anyday. |
well, true the CDJ100 isn't much.. but why do you need more than stop and start, a few cues pitch, and a jog wheel? it even has a few FX thrown in. true, i'd rather have a 1000, but for the price of a CDJ1000 MKII, i could have 4 CDJ 100s and $100 left over for CDs!
___________________

Visit my site Antiwar Homepage
|
|
Jul-16-2003 21:53
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:38.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|