|
| quote: | Originally posted by Nell
the binary finary track is availible for reproduction with permission.
hence neo & farina's recent attempt aswell on the platipus label.
skip, you DO need persmission to copy melodies and all, adn you cant just credit tha original artist, you must have there permission and if the track is still licensed to a label, you must have the labels permission aswell (like positiva still own the rights to binary finary, hence hte re-release this yr inc ronski speed mix). the original artists does not automatically get royalties, they have to be agreed before hand if there are any at all.
another example is:
barbers adagio for strings is availible for reproduction without permission
because he's dead for one, and no label is going to re-release the original. |
you don't need permission here in finland at least! and you can use some tracks like many years after the composer has died! i think it was 70 years or something like that, then you don't need even to pay the royalties!
how can scooter survive then if it's illegal to make covers without permission? they make nothing but covers and i'm pretty sure they haven't had a permission for most those tracks! why didn't m.i.k.e. sue them? because he had nothing on them! they hadn't done anything illegal!
that's the way it goes afaik! there's loads of covers but no one ever asks permission for those, because there's no need!
___________________

Get Dropbox, with 250 MB extra space!
|