|
| quote: | Originally posted by che
Actually, my father was in Iran a month ago or so and witnessed first hand the demages by misguided US missles, in a Iranian city across from Basra...just a though
That was an interesting report Occrider, thanks. Malnutrition i'm sure had a tromendous effect on the death rate as well, all i wanted to point out was what the cocksucker was saying about the photos of the dying children.... |
I never said they always succeeded in avoiding damage to things not specifically targeted. There are always going to be mistakes made, innocent people killed, and unwanted damage during a military conflict. It is the nature of the game, sad to say.
As to the authenticity of the damage you speak of, I can ask you this: Was your father there when the "errant missle" hit? Did he pull pieces from the debris that said "Raytheon", "Lockheed-Martin", "Boeing", "General Dynamics", or "Hughes Missile Systems" on it?
My point is not that no American ordinance fell in Iran, I am a realist and would be willing to wager that in all likelyhood a small number did. But just because your father saw some damage and was told it was "an American missile" does not make it proof. It could very well be propaganda. I also remember seeing during the war reports that a US missile had mistakenly gone into Iran and less than a day later the Iranian state news agency reported it was not an American missile but an Iraqi one.
I know the damage that can be caused by military hardware and that there is no "perfect system". You must remember though, the whole point of weapons is to damage/destroy property or kill people. It is a messy business which is why I feel we should do as much as possible to avoid the use of these weapons. The only way to guarantee a weapon will not kill an innocent bystander is to not shoot it at all.
MrS
___________________
Click the sig to see MrSquirrel

-"Reality" is the only word in the language that should always be used in quotes.
|