quote:

Originally posted by ahlamalek yes and whats wrong with that, the majority of Iraqis are for a religious-led state right now, who can blame them? After years of economic sanctions led by the UK and USA, years of suffering by a dictatorship, these people became less than poor, starving to death, they don't trust anyone now, they turn back to god. And guess who's gaining "political capital" right now? The only ones that are helping them with money and food, the clergy... I am not saying that religious govt are the way to go, i'm actually frankly opposed to them. But deciding for Iraqis is wrong. Let them be. Later, when they'll think not with their tummy but with their brains, people will want another form of govt (look at Iran). I want to add that, an imposed govt (eventually led by chalabi) will only fail in the coming years. It will be attecked coup after coup till it falls. This will bring the people back to what they want right now.

In all actuallity chalabi is not the one that makes the final constitution but that it is rather made by the council at large and then voted in by the all the memebers. from the looks of it they will declare iraq a muslim state but that it will not impose Islamic Shariah law (as like the recently published draft of the afghanistan constitution).

quote:

You can't rush a society from one form of govt to another.

i agree. and that is why setting up the government should take its time to make sure it is done correctly and effiently and not by some mob using current day emotions. thus the occupying force should take their time to make sure that the society makes a smooth transistion from government to government

___________________
If God is the answer, it must have been a very stupid question.

quote:

Originally posted by Izzy In all actuallity chalabi is not the one that makes the final constitution but that it is rather made by the council at large and then voted in by the all the memebers. from the looks of it they will declare iraq a muslim state but that it will not impose Islamic Shariah law (as like the recently published draft of the afghanistan constitution). i agree. and that is why setting up the government should take its time to make sure it is done correctly and effiently and not by some mob using current day emotions. thus the occupying force should take their time to make sure that the society makes a smooth transistion from government to government

With respect to the issue of the Iraqi constitution, despite the fact that the US has been trying to push it through in the 6 month time frame, the Iraqi governing council has been the body that has been hesistant in constructing a constitution in such a short time frame. I more or less think that it is a prudent decision to take the time necessary to make an all-enveloping constitution that will have the most benefit to Iraqi society.

Personally I think it is a finished war but an unfinished fight to secure the peace. Matters such as this take a lot of time. Thankfully it appears that there is no widespread support to abandon Iraq under Bush or any of the contending democrats. Hopefully, we'll stick with it until the end. Although the US wants to hand over authority to the Iraqis, right now that is an unfeasible scenario with the governing Iraqis themselves being reluctant to saddle themselves with that huge responsibility. Like it or not, we took on the risks of reconstructing Iraq, and now we have to see it through to the very end.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3153732.stm

___________________
Retro ...

wow you really always have a BBC link for everything, don't you!

quote:

Originally posted by Yoepus wow you really always have a BBC link for everything, don't you!

BBC is seriously one of my FAVORITE comprehensive news networks. I really think it is top notch among most other news agencies. It's closest competitors are cnn and reuters in my opinion and as of late I was very upset with Reuters when it did that article on the DOHA meetings in Cancun! However, I can never abandon reuters because it does comprehensive economic analyses of the latest indicators. My daily news search: Reuters(moderate/pro-EU) --> BBC(Mostly Neutral/minor bias) --> CNN International (Mostly Neutral) --> Economist (conservative) -- > Business Week (Moderate)--> Economy.com (daily economic indicator data!!!) Now when I say biased or neutral I'm speaking with respect to American vs. European bias which makes sense since I'm american. I don't know about any other bias since I'm not exposed to any other facts in depth.

Also the reason why I use BBC a lot is because it has THE BEST search tool for articles I have ever seen.

___________________
Retro ...

look, I don't care how convicing you make it sound, I'm still not buying a subscription to the BBC from you!

Damn... then I probably couldn't convince you to get an Alaska Airlines Visa card with 5,000 bonus miles, 2 free first class upgrades, board room passes, and a $50 round trip companion pass....either huh? Not to mention the fact that I have to remember that half the people on here aren't old enough for a credit card...let alone this one...ROFL


The only interesting thing that came to mind to me on this issue is when you titled it "unfinished war" I thought you were talking about The Korean Conflict. Until reading into it, I see you are not...but it's funny how some views are so short term...when we always seem to forget that this "war" hasn't "ended" either, some 40 years later.

I guess I'm not a person that thought this would be completely over for quick, clean and easy...major ops yes...and in fact I thought our operation was impressively fast, but I knew very well this whole thing would take forever to get through...people that use gorilla tactics never seem to disappear...plus it is the way these people have acted for ...well...quite possibly thousands of years.

bahh i can't think tonight...13 hours of flying did me in today.

___________________

"I'd like to buy a techno song."

Ok, my journalism teacher told me that I should narrow it down to one particular aspect of this war, so I decided to focus is on the unnecessary spending of the $87 billion Bush wanted to get from Congress. What are your opinions on it? When I mean unnecessary I mean that for example $1 million will be used to build a Saddam Hussein museum to show his atrocities and another $2.1 billion will be used to IMPORT petroleum products (wtf?)

quote:

Originally posted by Galapidate $2.1 billion will be used to IMPORT petroleum products (wtf?)

it's no secret that iraqi's oil producing infrastructure is a disaster needing major over haul.

btw where'd you get the allocation of money for the $87bil?
is there a report that says where each mil is going to be invested in? that would definitely be interesting to see.

___________________
If God is the answer, it must have been a very stupid question.

quote:

Originally posted by Izzy it's no secret that iraqi's oil producing infrastructure is a disaster needing major over haul. btw where'd you get the allocation of money for the $87bil? is there a report that says where each mil is going to be invested in? that would definitely be interesting to see.

Actually yes, there's an article in this week (October 6) TIME Magazine about the miscalculations of the war and where the U.S. went wrong, etc. On the second page I believe there is a side bar that shows the ways some of the $87 are being allocated.

quote:

Originally posted by PhloTron Damn... then I probably couldn't convince you to get an Alaska Airlines Visa card with 5,000 bonus miles, 2 free first class upgrades, board room passes, and a $50 round trip companion pass....either huh?

Nah that actually sounds good... hook me up