|
| quote: | Originally posted by zarathustra
As difficult as this may be to defend, I believe that two wrongs don't make a right and am against the death penalty.
Personally, if I were faced with:
1) Life in prison without the possibility of parole, spending every single day of my remaining life with the scum of humanity or by myself...
or
2) Death by lethal injection...
I would much rather the second alternative.
This whole situation does make me wonder however, if this guy killed 48 people, why is the prosecution bargaining with him? Don't they have enough evidence to convict him without his confession? Something doesn't seem right here. |
From what I listened to on NPR this morning, the prosecution had a couple of reasons. First, he has been very cooperative since his capture in confessing his other murders, as well as showing where the other bodies were located. Second, somehow they thought it would be difficult to prosecute - since the death penalty has been enacted in Washington St. some 30 years ago, there had only been 4 convictions. So I guess they consider that state somewhat anti-death penalty or something. Finally, the cost of trial, and the subsequent years on death row would have costed the WA taxpayers millions of dollars on this one case, which again wasn't too favorable to the prosecution.
All in all, I say BS - I'd hang this guy in a heartbeat, as I see this as a definite brutal exception to my anti-death penalty stance.
___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...
|