|
| quote: | Originally posted by rizen
you either missed my post, or are a complete idiot. Also where did the French, Russians, Saudies, etc lied in Iraq's WMD situation? So far France and Germany are right, NO WMDs. GG. |
I never said that France, Russia, et al. lied. Nobody lied.
Your argument: France says there are no WMDs. Russia says there are no WMDs. Bush tells the world that there are WMDs, but truly believed that there weren't any. Ergo, Bush lied.
Reminder at this point: a lie is an active deception.
The problem with your argument is that France and Russia said no such thing. Every major intelligence agency in the world believed there were WMDs in Iraq, although the amounts were debatable. (I believe the official French position was that there was "no irrefutable proof that WMDs had been retained or destroyed.") But as I said before, the debate in the UN was war versus inspections, not war versus do absolutely nothing. Lest we forget, Clinton pursued WMD disarmament as well. Was he a liar? Would he have bothered arguing for disarmament if he truly believed that there were no WMDs there? "Yeah, I'll just waste my time here at the UN. There really aren't any WMDs, but it would be cool if I said there were."
I have no problem with someone reveling in the fact that the intelligence agencies of the world were wrong. But to suggest that Bush is a liar is to suggest that every other intelligence agency in the world was in on the deception.
Go ahead and scream, "Bush was wrong!" But yeah, I know, it doesn't have the same power as "Bush lied!" I can sit here and debate this all day, because frankly, I need the posts.
p.s. The people who were the most surprised about not finding any WMDs were probably the French. After all, Israel in 1981 didn't destroy everything that France sold Iraq. There was plenty of equipment that's now completely unaccounted for.
Last edited by imokruok on Nov-24-2003 at 03:06
|