 |
|
|
|
 |
TwoPlow
good god, man

Registered: Jun 2003
Location: united states
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ Nuclear
Furthermore, testosterone is not the main producer of bodily hair. If it was, eunuchs would have none, right?
Bodily hair grows in preprogrammed genetic ways, often in response to hormones at certain stages. Testosterone can stimulate hair growth in certain cellular areas with testosterone receptors, but is not the source of it. |
Testosterone isn't produced in the testicles, obviously, nor does not having cajones stop testosterone production.
Armpit hair is there for the pherimones and such. Pubes on males regulate the temperature of the testicles for optimal sperm grown, in addition to trapping more pherimones and all that. For females it serves the same purpose as nose hair and such.
And I have no fucking clue why I know all that. Health class or something, I guess.
|
|
Nov-26-2003 03:40
|
|
|
 |
 |
Boomer187
Spicy Hotdog

Registered: Aug 2001
Location: USA
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by wick
edit: fuck someone beat me to it |
and by 3 mins...ha-ha
this is from ask alice...sounds good enough for me.
It's thought that the tufts of hair that grow around the genitals, as well as under the arms, capture these erotic scents. Pheromones get trapped in the pubic 'do when apocrine glands release an odorless secretion on the surface of the skin that combines with bacteria decomposed by the secretions of the sebaceous glands. Believe it or not, humans have the same number of hair follicles as apes, except our body hair is generally very fine or barely visible in comparison. So, while pubic hair and underarm hair might be considered the primary scent traps, they're by no means the only ones. For some people, scents from these areas are noticeable and consciously increase sexual arousal. For others, pheromones might not be obvious but may be detected subconsciously.
A few hypotheses also exist about why we have hair on our pubic places. Some people believe that it keeps our genitals warm. In prehistoric times, when only a loincloth was worn to cover the penis or vulva, this might have held true. However, the idea that a pubic mane exists for warmth doesn't make much sense in today's world since our genitals are kept toasty by clothing. In order for this theory to be true, it would seem that our bodies would probably have evolved to the point where we would have lost the need for pubic hair, which is not the case. Also, if it were intended for generating heat, wouldn't we have much more pubic hair? If this were so, men would probably have hair on the shaft of their penis and more hair on the scrotum to insulate the testicles; women would have hair on the skin of their lower torso to insulate the internal reproductive organs. Others believe that the purpose of women's pubic tresses is similar to that of cilia in the nose (a.k.a., nose hair), in that it prevents dirt from entering the vagina. Okay, this makes some sense... but why wouldn't men have similar protective locks around the opening of their urethra?
Other theories regarding the purpose of pubic hair probably exist, but currently, the pheromone theory seems to be the most logical. As far as non-functional use goes, pubic hair can be decorative or attractive to their owners or to others. Some of the related Q&As below explore the many aesthetic possibilities of pubic hairdos.
For more information about pheromones and their effect(s) on sexuality, look for James Vaughn Kohl and Robert T. Francoeur's book, The Scent of Eros: Mysteries of Odor in Human Sexuality.
|
|
Nov-26-2003 03:44
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:06.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|