|
| quote: | | Is it so hard to answer his question? |
Umm...
| quote: | The Jupiter series isn't overrated. Without it some of the warmest sounds you've ever heard in cinema and on hit records would not have been made.
But...there is no need for the Jupiter with a synth like Atmosphere. |
Let me revise that, there is little need for a Jupiter.
| quote: | By that do you mean that you have a compulsion to buy 20 year old synths that, like you said, create enough heat to melt a small glacier and require calibration and tuning every so many years? Are you a collector of vintage synths?
You are no doubt looking for warm pads, big basses and maybe a few huge leads.
For the warm pads, look no further than Atmosphere. For basses, no further than Trilogy.
Yes, I know, Atmosphere sampled the Jupiter "so it isn't as good". Well, all I can say is Persing used state of the art Apoggee converters, 32 bit, 192k, and state of the art knowledge. Some of the best samples ever captured and 96 percent as good as the real thing.
Look, I understand why you want a Jupiter, it's a legendary synth, but software is coming out these days based on samples taken from that specific synth that essentially precludes the need for the real thing. |
Sorry, but I think this is answering the question. I'm not saying softsynths can emulate a Jupiter, but I am saying that pristinely recorded samples can come very, very close.
___________________
Business is very food.
|