|
If we're going to blame killing someone on being "sick," then why can't we extend that to every day crimes? After all a "normal" person wouldn't commit a crime, would they? If that's the case why do we have punishments at all, after all it's not really their fault, it's biology's and genetic's fault. It's a rediculous precident to set, saying that merely the act of killing someone makes them "sick." Biology and genes can't wield a knife or pull a trigger, only a person can, and that person must be held accountable.
As far as the whole pro-life/death penalty thing goes... I think I said something about it earlier, but it's all about choice (ironic, I know). The unborn fetus/baby whatever you want to call it, has no choice as to whether it will be killed or allowed to live. The murderer has made a choice as to whether he will take the life of another, therefore allowing his own life to be taken in return. I would argue strongly that much the same way a victim of a murder would choose life over being killed, if it were possible to ask a fetus if it would like to be killed or allowed to live, it would also choose life.
|