|
Re: Re: Re: what laws would you make if you ruled the world?
| quote: | Originally posted by DigiNut
Any government-controlled distribution of social goods is, by definition, an unfair one. The only question is how many people are inconvenienced. |
Must be tough being Canadian then, eh?
Man, i come from what is probably the most prosperous Latin American "country" in the world. The only reason our income per capita is well above the rest is that we have been a US colony or "protectorate" for the past 100 years. PR didn't see any economic growth until the commonwealth status was implemented in 1952, along with an extension into the island of FDR's welfare state reforms.
Tax incentives for industrialization, social security, food stamps, Medicare- all of these policies of government-controlled distribution of goods catalyzed the economy, increased the GNP and income per capita, and significantly cut the gap between the rich and the poor. The flow of federal funds into our economy (10 times larger than what is given by the US to Israel) is also a form of govt. distribution of goods, sure. Call that unfair, if you will, call it colonialism-these are the tradeoffs. But at least we have a sound economy, and we don't have 3% of the population owning 95% of the country. Now that's what I call unfair.
Go to a Third World country and hang out with the rich people. Then go out into the streets, the public hospitals and schools without running water or electricity or books or teachers, and then lets talk about fairness.
|