 |
|
|
|
 |
squirrelly
The Phun Nun

Registered: Oct 2003
Location: In the Shower
|
|
|
Jan-31-2004 16:48
|
|
|
 |
 |
George Smiley
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Jan 2004
Location: 9 Bywater Street, Chelsea, London
|
|
|
DigNut...is that you strategy to "win arguments"? Once you see something you cannot for the life of you argue against, you order the poster that they may only write on the topic of the original post? Sorry, but this is how conversations work. Somebody says something, then somebody else adds something. Same with threads. You cannot tell me what to write, and you have no right doing so! You are not obligied to address any of my points, so if you consider them off topic - ignore them!!
| quote: | izzy:
"'giving it back' means that they had it in the first place, can you tell me when palestine was an independent country?" |
Not sure I should be answering that as it is slightly off topic! But anyway, I am refering to the original UN resolution in 1949 that divided Palestine into a Jewish and Arab state. Then the resolution of 1967 that did similar. According to international law, there should be a separate state, but no, there was no Palestine under control of Palestinians.
| quote: | yoepus:
"I believe you are a good person, with a good open mind.
So you should entertain your open mind, go read a scholarly book about the subject that contrasts with your point of view, see how it stands up to your arguments, who knows maybe you'll just learn a few things.." |
Thank you I hope I am a good person! I also wrote my dissertation (14,000 words) on Israel-Palestine, so I dont think I need to read a scholary book and contrast it with my views, as my views have come from my research (using your scholary books funnily enough!)
What? You assumed that cos I was from England I would know nothing about the subject?!
|
|
Jan-31-2004 19:32
|
|
|
 |
 |
Yoepus
Neo-condimist

Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Ketchup fields, Texas
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by George Smiley
Thank you I hope I am a good person! I also wrote my dissertation (14,000 words) on Israel-Palestine, so I dont think I need to read a scholary book and contrast it with my views, as my views have come from my research (using your scholary books funnily enough!)
What? You assumed that cos I was from England I would know nothing about the subject?! |
No I assumed that since you said the following...
| quote: |
Not sure I should be answering that as it is slightly off topic! But anyway, I am refering to the original UN resolution in 1949 that divided Palestine into a Jewish and Arab state. Then the resolution of 1967 that did similar. According to international law, there should be a separate state, but no, there was no Palestine under control of Palestinians. |
... That you didn't know anything about the subject. Now I am just wondering how someone can go write a 14,000 word dissertation without actually learning some basic facts about the topic of dissertation.
I guess this fact might be a contributing reason to Europe's declining level of higher education ( http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...threadid=157025 )
What laws are you refering to exactly when you say "the resolution of 1967 did similar"?
Gregorey, also out of scholarly curiosity, and since I do enjoy reading works that are contrasted against my own opnion regardless of how much I think I know, is there anyway I could read your dissertation?
thanks
___________________
SAVE ZIONIST MUSTARD: BUY ZIONIST KETCHUP!
Click here to support the free mustard alliance.
|
|
Jan-31-2004 20:01
|
|
|
 |
 |
Izzy
Virtue & Vice

Registered: Apr 2001
Location: TX TA #5
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by George Smiley
Not sure I should be answering that as it is slightly off topic! But anyway, I am refering to the original UN resolution in 1949 that divided Palestine into a Jewish and Arab state. Then the resolution of 1967 that did similar. According to international law, there should be a separate state, but no, there was no Palestine under control of Palestinians.
|
i have no problem going 'slightly' off topic. 
you're right about the partition plan. an independent palestinian state was offered but the plan was rejected, hence forth in no time was there a soverign palestinian country, vis-a-vis, no county to give back
i might also add that the representative of the Arab Higher Committee to the UN submitted a statement to the General Assembly in May 1947 that said "Palestine was a part of the Province of Syria" and that, "politcally, the Arabs of Palestine were not independent in the sense of forming a separate political entity."
but im sure the resolution you are refering to at the year 1967 is resolution 242. well i've read it before and it mentions nothing of an independent palestinian country, have a look for yourself:
http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/go.asp?MFAH00p40
nowhere does it mention that the palestinians be given any political rights or territory. they are only allued to in the second clause of the second article which calls for "a just settlement of the refugee problem."
not only does it not say anything about the creation of a new soveirgn state the PLO rejected the resolution to begin with. In a statement to the general assembly on Oct 15, 1968, the PLO said "the implementation of the said resolution will lead to loss of every hope for the establishment of peace and security in Palestine and the Middle East region".
agian at camp david, a 30 or so years later, the palestinians were offered full independance and soverignty once more, arafat rejected barak's offer...
are you noticing a pattern here?
___________________
If God is the answer, it must have been a very stupid question.
|
|
Jan-31-2004 20:07
|
|
|
 |
 |
George Smiley
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Jan 2004
Location: 9 Bywater Street, Chelsea, London
|
|
|
Izzy, quite right, I think it the division gave West Bank to Jordan, and Gaza to Egypt. But when ppl talk about partition now, and say 67 borders, they are refering to that resolution. Lets face it, Jordan and Egypt dont want those territories back now!!!
(oh, and I'm sure when Yeopus reads my dissertation he can explain to you exactly why the Camp David accords were a total joke from the Palestinian perspective, and the Oslo accords!!! )
|
|
Jan-31-2004 20:15
|
|
|
 |
 |
Izzy
Virtue & Vice

Registered: Apr 2001
Location: TX TA #5
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by George Smiley
Izzy, quite right, I think it the division gave West Bank to Jordan, and Gaza to Egypt. But when ppl talk about partition now, and say 67 borders, they are refering to that resolution. Lets face it, Jordan and Egypt dont want those territories back now!!!
(oh, and I'm sure when Yeopus reads my dissertation he can explain to you exactly why the Camp David accords were a total joke from the Palestinian perspective, and the Oslo accords!!! ) |
yes, i hope he shares that informatino with all of us 
___________________
If God is the answer, it must have been a very stupid question.
|
|
Jan-31-2004 20:20
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:06.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|