Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > Who will be Kerry's b1tch?
Who will be Kerry's VP????
You do not have permission to vote on this poll.
Edwards 8 33.33%
Dean 1 4.17%
Gephardt 1 4.17%
Clark 10 41.67%
Kenny 1 4.17%
Other 3 12.50%
Total: 24 votes 100%
  [Edit Poll (moderators only)]

Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
rizo
rizoholic



Registered: Apr 2003
Location: sf south bay

Guess I'm the only one who voted Gephardt. Oh well as long as it isn't Liberman I'll be happy

Old Post Feb-18-2004 19:59 
Click Here to See the Profile for rizo Click here to Send rizo a Private Message Add rizo to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Shakka
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Feb 2003
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by rizen
Guess I'm the only one who voted Gephardt. Oh well as long as it isn't Liberman I'll be happy



Looking back I'm surprised that Gephardt was knocked out so early while the sideshow that is Al Sharpton and Dennis Kucinich still remain. Do you think Geppie's heart (pardon the dumb pun) was really in the race or was he trying to set up something else down the road?

Old Post Feb-18-2004 20:16  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Shakka Click here to Send Shakka a Private Message Add Shakka to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
smokeape
Lowland Trance Addict



Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Heart of Dixie

Tonto, so he can get the Native American vote!




[[[smoke]]]

Old Post Feb-19-2004 00:03 
Click Here to See the Profile for smokeape Click here to Send smokeape a Private Message Add smokeape to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DaveSZ
When The Levee Breaks



Registered: Jan 2003
Location: ATX

quote:
Originally posted by Shakka
That's what they all say. It would be political suicide to stand up and say you're cool going for the VP post b/c that's exactly how seriously the voting public will take you.


Exactly.

I hope it's Clark, but it could also be Edwards or Graham from Florida.

I have a feeling Clark would be a part of the administration in some way, shape or form. But, if Edwards stays in the race long enough, he could practically force a VP position.


Kerry is so boring when he speaks, and has slightly more charisma than Al Gore and a block of wood. *Yawn*


Thus he needs somebody like Edwards.



quote:
Originally posted by Yoepus
bah how couldn't I of seen this sooner..

Hill-avery Clint-Clingon !

Update the poll!





She's the kiss of death.

Please no.


___________________
http://www.discoboomer.com/forums/

Old Post Feb-19-2004 02:04 
Click Here to See the Profile for DaveSZ Click here to Send DaveSZ a Private Message Add DaveSZ to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
occrider
Traveladdict



Registered: Oct 2000
Location: New York

quote:
Originally posted by DaveSZ
Exactly.

I hope it's Clark, but it could also be Edwards or Graham from Florida.

I have a feeling Clark would be a part of the administration in some way, shape or form. But, if Edwards stays in the race long enough, he could practically force a VP position.


Kerry is so boring when he speaks, and has slightly more charisma than Al Gore and a block of wood. *Yawn*


Thus he needs somebody like Edwards.


Yea I think a Kerry/Edwards matchup might be unbeatable come November given the latest pollings:

http://edition.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLI...poll/index.html

quote:



She's the kiss of death.

Please no.


Oh she most certainly is. I doubt I would ever vote for her


___________________
Retro ...

Old Post Feb-19-2004 02:25  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for occrider Click here to Send occrider a Private Message Add occrider to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DaveSZ
When The Levee Breaks



Registered: Jan 2003
Location: ATX

quote:
Originally posted by occrider
Yea I think a Kerry/Edwards matchup might be unbeatable come November given the latest pollings:

http://edition.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLI...poll/index.html



Oh she most certainly is. I doubt I would ever vote for her



Obviously if the election were held today the Dems would surely win, but what about in November? I wouldn't be so sure. What are the indicators for the job market saying? Is there any way that even half of those lost jobs could be recreated within the remaining time span until November?

Not that I'm at all worried about the "Nascar vote," since only 2 percent of them voted in 2000.



GWB reminds me of a bar bubba who wants to go kick everyone's ass that looks at him cock-eyed, so he does appeal to that aesthetic. The question is, will enough of those people go out and vote?



Also Kerry is an idiot for saying, “the democratic party shouldn’t be for the NRA.”

There goes W. Virginia, and perhaps Arkansas again (even though those are democrat states). This is all the more stupid considering the millions of sportsmen angered at Bush for his scorched Earth environmental policies. That’s the only main thing that annoys me about (some) of the democrats, but by and large they will be much better for our civil liberties than Ashcroft.

Also, the democrats have not elected another Northern candidate since 1960. The South still will not easily trust a Northern candidate from either party.

This is how you win Nationally:

http://www.chandlerforcongress.org/

Endorsed by the NRA, and Sierra Club and LCV.

It's not that hard. Catch on already.

Chandler's opponent ran as a GWB clone, and she lost badly. Good.


___________________
http://www.discoboomer.com/forums/

Last edited by DaveSZ on Feb-19-2004 at 10:08

Old Post Feb-19-2004 03:11 
Click Here to See the Profile for DaveSZ Click here to Send DaveSZ a Private Message Add DaveSZ to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
rizo
rizoholic



Registered: Apr 2003
Location: sf south bay

IIRC Kerry said his VP choice would be Gephardt and vice versa, so hope no one got the idea I actually wanted Gephardt to be VP. I don't want either to be P/VP

Old Post Feb-19-2004 09:28 
Click Here to See the Profile for rizo Click here to Send rizo a Private Message Add rizo to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DaveSZ
When The Levee Breaks



Registered: Jan 2003
Location: ATX

Gephardt is so boring, but of course it would be a tactical move to try and win some of those key Midwestern states that a Northern candidate must win.

The non-urban part of Missouri tends to be quite conservative, but the state has lost some 70,000 jobs in the last 3 or 4 years.

It's hard to imagine the turnout for Bush would be very enthusiastic among many conservatives.


___________________
http://www.discoboomer.com/forums/

Old Post Feb-19-2004 10:10 
Click Here to See the Profile for DaveSZ Click here to Send DaveSZ a Private Message Add DaveSZ to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
rizo
rizoholic



Registered: Apr 2003
Location: sf south bay

quote:
Originally posted by DaveSZ
Gephardt is so boring, but of course it would be a tactical move to try and win some of those key Midwestern states that a Northern candidate must win.
All of them are boring


DEAN

Old Post Feb-19-2004 10:14 
Click Here to See the Profile for rizo Click here to Send rizo a Private Message Add rizo to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
priveye03
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Bergen, Norway

quote:
Originally posted by DaveSZ
Obviously if the election were held today the Dems would surely win, but what about in November? I wouldn't be so sure. What are the indicators for the job market saying? Is there any way that even half of those lost jobs could be recreated within the remaining time span until November?

Not that I'm at all worried about the "Nascar vote," since only 2 percent of them voted in 2000.



GWB reminds me of a bar bubba who wants to go kick everyone's ass that looks at him cock-eyed, so he does appeal to that aesthetic. The question is, will enough of those people go out and vote?



Also Kerry is an idiot for saying, “the democratic party shouldn’t be for the NRA.”

There goes W. Virginia, and perhaps Arkansas again (even though those are democrat states). This is all the more stupid considering the millions of sportsmen angered at Bush for his scorched Earth environmental policies. That’s the only main thing that annoys me about (some) of the democrats, but by and large they will be much better for our civil liberties than Ashcroft.

Also, the democrats have not elected another Northern candidate since 1960. The South still will not easily trust a Northern candidate from either party.

This is how you win Nationally:

http://www.chandlerforcongress.org/

Endorsed by the NRA, and Sierra Club and LCV.

It's not that hard. Catch on already.

Chandler's opponent ran as a GWB clone, and she lost badly. Good.


I want to see where the poll took place, or at least where the majority of the poll took place. If it was just in Wisconsin, then I see no wonder. Or did they actually get people out of the whole of the country?

Old Post Feb-19-2004 10:49  Germany
Click Here to See the Profile for priveye03 Click here to Send priveye03 a Private Message Add priveye03 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DaveSZ
When The Levee Breaks



Registered: Jan 2003
Location: ATX

quote:
Originally posted by DaveSZ
What are the indicators for the job market saying? Is there any way that even half of those lost jobs could be recreated within the remaining time span until November?



Ok well here is the answer:

quote:


Published on Thursday, Febraury 19, 2004 by Yahoo! News
Job Loss, Rising Inequalities Dog Bush Administration
by Emad Mekay

WASHINGTON, D.C., Feb 18 (IPS) - The wealth gap between the rich and poor and the sluggish job market in the United State are looming as major problems for President George W. Bush (news - web sites) as he campaigns for another term in office, analysts here say.
According to the latest figures, the wealth gap has been growing over the past decade, despite a boom in housing and the stock market, while the job situation, another important economic indicator, has also worsened.


There is a significant, and growing, wealth gap between lower-income households and the rest of America, said a report released Tuesday by the Consumer Federation of America, Credit Union National Association and the National Credit Union Foundation.


Between 1992 and 2001, the net wealth of low-income U.S. households increased by only seven percent--from $6,261 to $6,720. By comparison, the net wealth of all U.S. households increased by 42 percent--from $60,695 to $86,100, said the report.


In 2001 the net wealth of the typical poor household was $6,720 compared to $86,100 for the typical U.S. household, a wealth gap of thirteen to one, it added.


While the findings are unlikely to feature highly in the ongoing heated debate between Democrats and Republicans in the run-up to the November presidential election, experts say it is likely to have a psychological effect on consumers already worried about job losses.


Increasingly the focus in debates between Democratic contenders for Bush's job and between the president and the opposition has been the unemployment rate.


Under Bush's presidency, the unemployment rate has shot up from 4.2 percent in 2001 to 5.6 percent now, a 33 percent increase, and above the five percent rate that many economists consider to be the natural jobless rate.


The Washington-based Center for Economic and Policy Research estimates that at the current rate of job creation it will take two-and-a-half more years just to regain the jobs lost under the current administration.


The center also says that Bush could become the first president in more than 70 years to accumulate a net loss of jobs during his term.


Today some eight million Americans are out of work.


And although Bush told workers this week there is an undeniable sense of economic optimism across the country, a new ABC News/Money Magazine poll found that consumer confidence took its biggest plunge in more than 18 years of polling.


On everything from shipping U.S. jobs overseas, to stripping worker protections, to rewarding companies for reducing health benefits for their employees, the Bush administration has racked up a spectacular record of exacerbating the already difficult economic challenges Americans are facing, said the Center for American Progress, a Washington think tank founded by members of the administration of former President Bill Clinton.


This week, the administration received sharp criticism over its approval of the growing trend of companies relocating U.S. jobs overseas.


Many of these firms move their production lines to developing countries, where they profit from cheaper labor cost. Many U.S. technology companies, for example, use Indian tech workers instead of their more expensive U.S. counterparts.


Late last week Democratic Senator Tom Daschle introduced a bill that would hamper the offshoring of jobs.


The legislation requires any company that plans to lay off 15 or more workers and send those jobs overseas to disclose how many jobs are affected, where the jobs are going and why they are being offshored.


Firms would also be required to give dislocated workers three months warning and notify federal and state agencies responsible for helping laid-off workers.

Embattled administration economist N. Gregory Mankiw on Tuesday had to defend comments he made last week praising the shipping of jobs abroad as a long-term benefit for the U.S. economy.

Economists and non-economists speak two different languages, Mankiw, chairman of Bush's Council of Economic Advisers, told the National Economists Club.

Republicans, including House of Representatives Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, joined forces with opposition Democrats to criticize Mankiw for describing outsourcing of jobs as a new way of doing international trade.

Creating an environment for robust job creation is a paramount goal of the president and his economic team, he added.

Bush took the same message last weekend to Florida, a swing state whose votes in 2000 helped put him in the White House.

The president said the economy under his watch has become lively, and could be further boosted with tax cuts, one of his favorite economic measures.

But Democrats were quick to point out that the President, who promised that tax cuts would create 131,200 jobs in Florida, failed to mention that only 61,800 jobs have emerged, a shortfall of almost 70,000 jobs in the state.

Other administration officials followed the same script in early campaigning for the vote. Treasury Secretary John W. Snow, Commerce Secretary Don Evans, Labour Secretary Elaine L. Chao, and Small Business Administrator Hector Barreto are now visiting the U.S. northwest, one of the regions hardest-hit by job losses, to promise that their plans will eventually create jobs.

On Wednesday, White House Spokesman Scott McClellan stressed Bush's record on job creation. At a press briefing in Washington he told reporters that more than 366,000 jobs were created in the last five months.

The unemployment rate continues to decline, he said. It is now at the lowest point it has been in two years, and it is below the average of the '70s, '80s, and '90s.

But the U.S. Labor Department reported that only 1,000 jobs were gained in December, far below the expectations of some experts, who had predicted growth of 150,000 posts.

The White House on Wednesday refused to repeat forecasts that the administration will be able to add 2.6 million jobs to the economy by the end of this year.

When asked whether the White House still stands behind the forecast issued nine days ago by the Council of Economic Advisors, McClellan declined to back the figure.

I think that people can debate the numbers all they want, he said. The President is focused on acting on policies to create as robust an environment for job creation as possible, so that we can help those who are hurting because they are looking for work and cannot find a job.

The Democrats strongest contender to date for Bush's job, John Kerry, poked fun at the prediction.

George Bush is saying he's going to create 2.6 million jobs this year alone--and his advisers are saying, 'what, you didn't actually believe that did you'?


___________________
http://www.discoboomer.com/forums/

Old Post Feb-19-2004 22:54 
Click Here to See the Profile for DaveSZ Click here to Send DaveSZ a Private Message Add DaveSZ to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > Who will be Kerry's b1tch?
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (2): « 1 [2]  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackstuck in my head (please id) [2008] [1]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackStephen J Kroos - Phantazmz (Original Mix) [2004]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 19:12.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!