Registered: Jul 2003
Location: New York City in a Café del Mar mood
quote:
Originally posted by cammie
well he wouldn't be the first actor to become President of the United States. R. Reagan was before him...so sad now that he doesn't remember anything ( oh....like he ever did!! )
Ouch that was rough, Alzheimers is nothing to kid about, saw a piece on the other night about how it can turn an active person into a vegetable over time, scary stuff indeed.
Yeah I know you're just kidding however about Reagan
___________________
Trance = Heart, Mind, Body and Soul all in 1
Current fav. Global Experience = Madras
Feb-24-2004 03:21
Psionic
Dark & Dirty
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Wouldn't be the first actor, but would be the first action film star
Still, I don't want that amendment passed. And if he does become president I'm moving.
Feb-24-2004 04:11
rizo
rizoholic
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: sf south bay
Wait, so the right is all for this amendment but not for when Clinton wanted to allow more than 2 terms of presidency (2 terms, then a break, then another term, and not continuously)?
Feb-25-2004 07:23
occrider
Traveladdict
Registered: Oct 2000
Location: New York
quote:
Originally posted by rizen
Wait, so the right is all for this amendment but not for when Clinton wanted to allow more than 2 terms of presidency (2 terms, then a break, then another term, and not continuously)?
Huh? How are these issues one and the same? Furthermore, how has the right portrayed it as such? More pertinent to the issue, how do YOU percieve these two issues to be similar? I'm truly perplexed since the concept of term limits and grounds for eligibility are fundamentally diametrically opposed to one another. Oh yes ... the VRWC
___________________
Retro ...
Feb-25-2004 08:15
priveye03
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Bergen, Norway
quote:
Originally posted by rizen
Wait, so the right is all for this amendment but not for when Clinton wanted to allow more than 2 terms of presidency (2 terms, then a break, then another term, and not continuously)?
I think that they think arnold will fuck up more then bush, so they would support him to make the GOP look a bit better.
Feb-25-2004 12:54
rizo
rizoholic
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: sf south bay
quote:
Originally posted by occrider
Huh? How are these issues one and the same? Furthermore, how has the right portrayed it as such? More pertinent to the issue, how do YOU percieve these two issues to be similar? I'm truly perplexed since the concept of term limits and grounds for eligibility are fundamentally diametrically opposed to one another. Oh yes ... the VRWC
) 
