|
| quote: | Originally posted by NeoPhono
Uhm, maybe I'm missing something here, but isn't trying to "kill" religion or mandate atheism just the same as a religious person trying to force their beliefs on the non-religious?
It's just one person forcing a belief on another, regardless if you are trying to force the existance of a divinity or the absence of one. Maybe I'm taking this wrongly, but this seems a little hypocritical.
Let people think what they want to think, if you don't like what they think, don't listen.
|
It could be interpreted similarly. However, I don't think the intention is to dictate anyone's private beliefs so much as abolish the harmful institution of organized religion. I don't support doing this by force, but making every effort to illuminate the simple truth of the matter in an endeavor to eliminate this harmful institution is hardly analogous to an imposition or indoctrination of a set of beliefs, but rather is more akin to education.
When theists keep their beliefs to themselves, or at least don't push them as facts, I can respect their position. However, I am not inclined to look favorably upon the indoctrination of millions of innocent children with irrational religious dogma. You may as well be raping them - it's merely on an intellectual level rather than physical. But that doesn't make it any less real, any less harmful, or any less deplorable - at least in my view. The many wars, terrorist acts, and other acts of violence against other human beings which are a product of religion are well documented.
At this point, religion becomes not only a personal belief, but dangerous creature which can and does produce serious harm to other individuals. It is religion in this manifestation which fully ought to be completely obliterated.
|