Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Main Forums > Chill Out Room > Anyone ever thought of this??
Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
vasyachkin
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Brooklyn

Not if its a CD. CD frequency range's upper limit precisely mathes that of human ear.

Vinyl extends a bit further into dog range.

SACD and DVD-A extend further still.

Old Post Mar-25-2004 19:59  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for vasyachkin Click here to Send vasyachkin a Private Message Visit vasyachkin's homepage! Add vasyachkin to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
SeeK
Addicted 4 Life



Registered: Feb 2001
Location: Australia

quote:
Originally posted by Boomer187
^^actually I think what he was talking about was the frequency range that is higher pitched which humans cannot hear and dogs can. kinda like a dog whistle.


Yes.... what i was tryin 2 get across...

Old Post Mar-26-2004 01:15  Turkey
Click Here to See the Profile for SeeK Click here to Send SeeK a Private Message Visit SeeK's homepage! Add SeeK to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DJ-Fuq
gone



Registered: Apr 2002
Location: nowhere

quote:
Originally posted by Boomer187
I thought it was the other way around, that most go up to 28k or 30k, and only a few only go up to 22k.

They do? Shows how much i know then heh

Old Post Mar-26-2004 02:14 
Click Here to See the Profile for DJ-Fuq Click here to Send DJ-Fuq a Private Message Add DJ-Fuq to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
vasyachkin
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Brooklyn

quote:
Originally posted by Lephaid
Dogs can hear >22khz, the end limit of the human audible range (most people can only even hear 18,000-19,000...when I tested myself with an analogue synthesizer, sine waves only up to 18,500 could be heard). Things like CDs right out of a store probably sound very very different to a dog than they do to us.

If you wanted them to sound the same to a dog, you would have to cut all the frequencies above 22khz. Not sure what the point would be though, because we don't even know how well animals can interpret music.


CD uses a 44 khz sampling rate that places a theoretical limit of its resolution at 22 khz ( according to Nyquist sampling theorem ).

however the practical limit of CD is 20 khz and the extra 2 khz are required to implement filtering that is needed to block all frequencies above 22 khz that would otherwise cause aliasing, which is a form of distortion. ideal filters that would allow a full 22 khz range are not physically realizable only exist in theory.

thus a CD does not actually contain frequencies above 22 khz and has very little between 20 and 22.

Old Post Mar-26-2004 20:03  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for vasyachkin Click here to Send vasyachkin a Private Message Visit vasyachkin's homepage! Add vasyachkin to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
DigiNut
You kids get off my lawn!



Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto, Self-proclaimed Centre of the Universe

quote:
Originally posted by vasyachkin
CD uses a 44 khz sampling rate that places a theoretical limit of its resolution at 22 khz ( according to Nyquist sampling theorem ).

however the practical limit of CD is 20 khz and the extra 2 khz are required to implement filtering that is needed to block all frequencies above 22 khz that would otherwise cause aliasing, which is a form of distortion. ideal filters that would allow a full 22 khz range are not physically realizable only exist in theory.

thus a CD does not actually contain frequencies above 22 khz and has very little between 20 and 22.

Um, lowpass filtering does not take up an extra 2 kHz of bandwidth. I think you are confusing this with MP3 encoding, which typically filters tracks above 20 or 21 kHz because most people cannot hear above that range and that is also where the majority of distortion occurs.

I could see them doing it for CDs as well - but the reasons for this would not be what you said, more like:

1. The Nyquist rate is only a theoretical limit and assumes ideal reconstruction of the output signal; in reality, even if the sampling perfectly captures every frequency up to 22 kHz, the reconstruction process is not ideal, and those 22 kHz frequencies may actually get folded down to 1 or 2 kHz.

2. Most people cannot hear above 20 kHz or even 18 kHz and the intensity of thermal noise is proportional to the bandwidth of the system; hence, filtering sounds above 20 kHz helps reduce the noise floor and makes the recording more accurate.

3. Filtering with a cutoff frequency of 20 kHz does not actually mean that all sounds above 20 kHz will be eliminated; in reality there is an interval between the cutoff (3-dB or half-power) frequency and the point where attenuation is high enough to make it equivalently "zero". When you filter sound, you have a choice between a short cutoff interval and high ripple in the passband, or a longer cutoff interval and a relatively flat passband - obviously for audio, you want the flat passband, so you have to settle for a bit of a "hill" at the end of your filter spectrum. Thus any filtering at 20 kHz would probably be used in order to be absolutely sure that no frequencies above 22 kHz or so are present in the spectrum. This is kind of like what you said, except that the filter isn't actually eliminating frequencies between 20 to 22 kHz - it's just attenuating them, and they will still be present in the final encoding, just at lower amplitudes.

As for canine frequencies, who fuckin' cares.


___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here

Old Post Mar-26-2004 21:20  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for DigiNut Click here to Send DigiNut a Private Message Add DigiNut to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
vasyachkin
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Brooklyn

anyway my point was we and dogs would hear the same thing from a CD cuz CD's range is tailored to our hearing range.

Old Post Mar-30-2004 07:52  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for vasyachkin Click here to Send vasyachkin a Private Message Visit vasyachkin's homepage! Add vasyachkin to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Main Forums > Chill Out Room > Anyone ever thought of this??
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (2): « 1 [2]  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackfinal one for now. [2003] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackGigi D'Agostino - "Un Giorno Credi" [2002]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:18.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!