|
| quote: | Originally posted by Cal
Well your input is wrong
And you keep saying its right without proving me wrong!
WTH
We are not talking about the unemployed. We are talking about the unemployment rate.
And a bum that is begging for quarters and is living on the sreet with no hope is not included in the calculation just as a law school graduate who, instead of lookng for work, is bumming around his rich parents house is not included either!!!
And how the hell is poverty even relevant here?
Same for anyone who is not looking for a job filthy rich or plain filthy, that person IS NOT INCLUDED in calculating the rate.
But Q5echo doesn't even know this basic shit, and neither do you, but still the both of you continue to argue all these Greenspan scale theories!
Get some goddamn education first. |
Sigh ... ok look, the unemployment figure is designed to capture those who WANT to look for work and those who NEED to look for work. If you're a daddy's rich kid who spends 10 minutes a year looking for a job then you're not on the unemployment report because that would be a statistical anomoly. Poverty is largely relevant becuase that is one of the MAJOR reasons most people even work! For christ's sake I'm going to reiterate myself here ... it doesn't matter if you're filthy rich or filthy poor, as long as you WANT a job, which is evident by you LOOKING for a job, you're included on the unemployment report. If you're in a situation such that you don't even care to look for a job than you're an irrelevant statistic that should not be included even in the event that the job market is doing well. But PLEASE tell me how the unemployment report should be revised to provide an effective government statistic. But hey ... Canada's unemployment rate is conducted in a similar manner, at 7.4% just THINK of how many there are not counted who are looking for work!!!
Nice to know my economics degree doesn't count as education 
___________________
Retro ...
|