|
In all do respect guys this is different.
He is not some ancestorial claim suing people who had never participate in this event.
This is a live and breathing man suing a company which in large part contributed to his sterilization.
This happened in HIS very own lifetime, and he has the right for compensation. Until 1991, he could not sue the participants who sterilized him due to a law granting Germany a 'lawsuit' peace.
Since this has expired, and he is still living, and the company that committed this offense to him still is in existance - and still has not offered or given him reperations, then he is more then entitled to get these reperations.
Again, this is not his children, or grandchildren asking for reperiations (he can't have children!), its him.
Lets put this in a civil context and see how you guys would like it;
You go to your doctor for an examination, he is slipped 1,000,000 by a US drug pharmaseutical to sterilize this man, and the Doctor accepts the money and does so.
The patient doesn't find out for another 2 years that he has been sterilized, yet a new US law banning all malpractice lawsuits against doctors has passed in that timeframe that sunsets only in 50 years.
So then you come after 50 years and sues the drug pharmaseutical for their criminal act.
I don't see any problem with this - afterall, if I pay someone to murder/sterilize someone, US criminal law says I am as quilty as the man who pulled the trigger/injection.
I think the German government should have settled this case perhaps on their corporations behalf, but it still remains what it is - an unsettled legitimate suit against a German company obligated to reperations.
Now perhaps this man should have forgiven the Germans and/or simply not cared about reperations. There are many Jews like this that refused to be reperated. But he didn't and that doesn't make his case any less legitimate or not.
___________________
SAVE ZIONIST MUSTARD: BUY ZIONIST KETCHUP!
Click here to support the free mustard alliance.
|