 |
|
|
|
 |
MsGod
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: We call it ATL cuz it's easy to spell...
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by LinX
thats really strange bc i have a few friends that own the software and have no problems with it.. try calling support maybe they can answer your questions, dont give up from what ive heard its a great piece of software |
Yeah, we have one...and it works AWESOME...
___________________
Theres no hope with dope...
|
|
Jun-14-2004 16:22
|
|
|
 |
 |
opianstate
Senior tranceaddict

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
|
|
|
E-vangelist:
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, thats no reason to go name-calling on an online forum. We all know that TFS goes for about $500 new. However, you must buy a machine to run it on. And you have to buy a somewhat fast machine. If you factor in the price of the machine plus the price of the software, that does come to about the price of 2 CDJs. You're going to want something with a good processor speed and alot of memory, that isnt cheap at all. Not everyone has a spare G4 powerbook just laying around, maybe YOU should do your research.
As far as your other somewhat ignorant post, Final Scratch ***DOES NOT*** work for everyone. And since the support for the application does not exist (most users speculate because NI gets so many complaints they just gave up), there is no way to get it running on a particular machines. I owned a machine that was "compatible" and 1.1 would not even install, let alone run. 1.0 had USB issues, it could not detect the ScratchAmp. 1.5 was the worst of all. I don't even know where to start. It was completely unusable. The sound quality was horrible, there was 1-2 second audio drop outs, and it would crash randomly for no reason. It was a nightmare.
Check the online forums, you will find an amazing number of people who are having serious problems with the software. The fact of the matter is, Stanton did not do their homework when they created 1.5. You list "hardware error" as one of the problems . . . reality check man, that's still a problem. Compatibility issues are something that should be addressed BY THE MANUFACTURER. If you want to hear any more "morons" complain about TFS, then I will get ahold of some of the people of the FS forums that I struggled with to post here.
Like I say, I'm glad that you have had a good experience with FinalScratch. But don't be ignorant and think that you're the only one who uses this application. Not everyone has been as lucky as you. So please think before posting. There's no problem with saying that it works for you, but there is a problem with making a generalization.
___________________
i turn to the music
cause it never lets me down
Last edited by opianstate on Jun-14-2004 at 18:16
|
|
Jun-14-2004 17:15
|
|
|
 |
 |
nrjizer
vive le deep

Registered: Jan 2001
Location: Bumfuck, GA
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by E-vangelist
*MORON ALERT! MORON ALERT!*
Final Scratch 1.5 is a Windows XP native application, for weeks now I have been playing mp3's with FS SOLELY off of mapped network drives WIRELESSLY thru my network. so that "you have to have the tunes on one little hard disk" is just ignorant.
and his pricing is REVERSED... for the price of ONE decent CDJ deck you can get TWO Final Scratch (not that you'd need them)...
try doing some research before opening your mouth next time |
Try reading more closely before opening your mouth next time. I'm fully aware of the price of the FinalScratch SOFTWARE. Since I'm feeling patient and tolerant today, I'll say it once more, with emphasis so you can understand:
"For the price of a laptop and FS/rane software you can be close to 2 CDJ-1000 MK2's."
Perhaps it is more clear now? I know that Final Scratch costs $500. But you need a laptop to run it on. FS reccomends a 1.6 ghz processor with 256 mb of ram. You will also need a HD large enough to hold your collection of songs, since full length trance tracks in quality .wav format are going to run about 100mb each. So you're starting to look at about another $1000 for the laptop, at least.
So you're already looking at about $1500 worth of stuff, which is already about enough for a pair of CDJ-800's and is getting close to the $2000 you'd need for a pair of CDJ-1000's.
Oh, and if you're building yourself a whole new setup from scratch, add $800 to that for a pair of turntables and $100 for mid-range carts. And that doesn't include a mixer. So you're up to about $2400 now, plus the price of a mixer by getting a whole new setup with FS, whereas a whole new CDJ-1000 setup is only $2000 + a mixer.
Now then, putting all cost issues aside, lets compare FS with a CDJ setup:
Both FS and CDJ's share one key attribute, which is that they both play music digitally, instead of analoge like vinyl, thus you get a loss in quality on a big sound system. So, what advantage is there to these systems that makes them worth their cost, and makes them worth using in place of vinyl?
With FS you get the feel of vinyl and the ease of having all your tracks on a small laptop. But, whats the real point then? If you've got the kind of money it takes to buy FS and a laptop, why not just buy vinyl? The ease of carrying a laptop around instead of a bag of records isn't much of an excuse for $500 (for the software alone). I mean, I'm really shedding tears over here for these superstar DJ's who have to put up carrying a bag(s) of records around while they are flown all over the world every week and make more money on a saturday night than a lot of people do in a year. What about mp3's? Mp3 won't cut it on a big system, not to mention it's pretty lame to be making money at gigs off mp3's you've downloaded. If you just want to mix mp3's in your bedroom, you can buy a pair of CDJ-100's and a cheap mixer for about $750 new. Or you can use Traktor, or any other mp3 mixing software. And unless I'm mistaken, there's no online service that lets you purchase and download .wav's of tracks. I know beatport will mail you burned CD's with your wav's, but why not just use CDJ's then?
With good CDJ's, however, there are plenty of obvious advantages, not just over Final Scratch, but over vinyl turntables completely. Want proof? Go download any set by James Zabiela. CDJ's can loop, set cue points, reverse instantly, pitch up or down by 50%, can change tempo without altering the pitch, and a million other things that I can't possibly name from memory. CD's also do not suffer from wear and heat like records, and you don't have to replace stylii. CD wallets are also light and easy to carry around, probably lighter than a 8 pound laptop too. And if your CD wallet gets stolen just go back to your house/studio and re-burn them (assuming you've backed up). If your laptop gets stolen you're fucked, and out a lot of money.
So then, what can we conclude? If you want to mix with the vinyl feel, just buy vinyl. You get a wide selection of releases and all the sound quality of analogue. If you want to go digital, or tire of lugging records around, go CDJ. They can do far, far, far, far, far more things than Final Scratch can do. If you want to just mix mp3's at home, get a setup of cheap CDJ's and a cheap mixer, or just use $30 mp3 mixing software on your computer. Mp3 quality won't cut it at gigs, nor is it fair to the artists to be paid for spinning their tracks that you've downloaded. Unless FS comes up with some truly revolutionary features, CDJ's are simply a much better choice.
___________________
NEW MIX [Feb/March 2008]
|
|
Jun-14-2004 22:52
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:22.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|