Should Portagul have won? (page 2)

Become a part of the TranceAddict community!

Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven't

TranceAddict Forums > Archives > Classic old threads / Inactive Forums > Retired Forums > UEFA Euro 2004 > Should Portagul have won?

Pages (2): « 1 [2]

Last Thread Next Thread

Author

Thread

Ian
Not dead yet.

Registered: Dec 2001
Location: UK

Portugal were blatantly the better side, and the lack of ambition shown by the dutch paid, Makaay isn't a winger, he's a goalscorer and has to be in the middle to do that

Jul-01-2004 00:37

Click here to Send Ian a Private Message

visje
Senior tranceaddict

Registered: Dec 2003
Location: The Hague, Netherlands

even if it counted we had lots of luck with the 2-1 (quiet a goal it was ). portugal deserved the win and had way better chances (pauleta 1 on 1 with van de sar how could he miss that!!)

Jul-01-2004 08:30 Netherlands

Click here to Send visje a Private Message

Tim81
Let's Rock!

Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Renaissance

Yes!

What a stupid question! I think everybody agrees with this...

Jul-01-2004 09:47 Netherlands

Click here to Send Tim81 a Private Message

Blik
The Almighty Blik

Registered: Jan 2001
Location: Rosmalen, Holland

he was offside, simple as that

and the yellow card for Ronaldo was far, it isn't allowed any more to take your shirt off after you scored a goal, dumb rule

*closed*

discuss in the Portugal vs Holland topic

___________________
Alsof Het G*dverdomme Himmel Niks Kost!!!

Jul-01-2004 11:34

Click here to Send Blik a Private Message

RenderedDream
what should i put here?

Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Aveiro

quote:
Originally posted by visje
(pauleta 1 on 1 with van de sar how could he miss that!!)

i'd like to know that too
and what the hell is "portagul"