|
| quote: | Originally posted by drizzt81
I respect that too. I think it is the gentleman's choice. Elections should be about VOTES, not litigations.
I think that a Civil War wouldn't hurt the US, especially if the outcome were a more sophisticated (as in harder to manipulate) voting law. I think it is rediculous that people have to wait 5 hours to vote. In the end, this is the US, not some 3rd world country.
In the end, the productivity LOST due to crappy voting is probably close to the damage done by viruses. Especially if the same accounting standards are used. |
I don't think there should be a civil war, but you do have a point about the long lines waiting to vote. There should have been more polling places in cities if lines were that long. Many people were turned away from voting, because the polls closed despite some waiting in lines for hours. If the polls close at 7 and you get there at 7:01 you shouldn't be able to vote, but people in Florida and Ohio were still waiting and never got a chance to vote. That puts a cap on how many people can vote in some urban areas, which is not democratic.
___________________
Download My Spring '08 Mix Here
Thurs May 15: Influence @ Tini Martini w/ Kris B. vs. Nosmo, Rikler & Mike Palmeri
Thurs June 5: Under the Influence @ Tini Martini w/Mathias Matthew, Jack Kim & more TBA
|