 |
|
|
|
 |
Aesthetic
- ---(ps3.addicted)--- -

Registered: Jul 2002
Location: somewhere between the melody and the pads
|
|
|
Nov-07-2004 08:07
|
|
|
 |
 |
AussieTrance
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Melbourne
|
|
|
dont use em
___________________
yep
|
|
Nov-07-2004 09:03
|
|
|
 |
 |
Joax
tranceaddict
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
|
|
From theage.com.au - (use username 'rupertpacker' password 'milliways' to gain access rather than have to sign up to a free account, account from http://www.bugmenot.com/):
http://theage.com.au/articles/2004/...9547421920.html
http://theage.com.au/articles/2004/...9547426040.html
http://theage.com.au/articles/2004/...9547418079.html
I can't find it now but I remember reading in the age a statistic like "One in four young people have tried ecstasy". I found this interesting, I thought usage would be a lot lower.
I can see both sides of the argument...
For publicly-funded testing - saves lives, reduces chance, helps to reduce bad pills being sold (if every pill is tested and results announced by a government body the likelihood of people purchasing these pills falls, therefore pills either become higher quality or dissapear off the market), better quality testing.
Against publicly-funded testing - government and police seen to not condone, issues of supporting drugs avoided, upholds police view of them being illegal, drugs are only used by people who delve in to the black market, etc.
My view - There was some truth in the Green's idea of legalising illegal drugs... it wipes out or minimises the black market, brings producers and sellers into the 'light' market, decreases risks and may save lives. Of course, doing so may lead to more and more people taking up the drug, the public may see it as condoned and abuse it. Its tricky and who knows which choice is correct.
Does anyone have any statistics on Amsterdam?
I guess its better to stay with the current than risk the change.
___________________
Joax (Pronounced 'jokes')
Itsuisee - if this stuffs up it screws everything else
|
|
Nov-08-2004 10:23
|
|
|
 |
 |
mongeone
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: osaka, japan
|
|
|
so what happens if they test a pill say it is fine and then the person goes aight drops it and then drops dead? can the family sue?
good idea nonetheless just gotta sort out that little problem!
___________________
Ladies and gentlemen... we are floating in space!
"If you take the simplest, crudest notion of self-consciousness, I suppose that would be the sort of self-consciousness that a lobster has: When it`s hungry, it eats something, but it never eats itself. It has some way of distinguishing between itself and the rest of the world, and it ahs a rather special regard for itself."
Daniel Dennett
|
|
Nov-09-2004 07:11
|
|
|
 |
 |
tubby
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: sydney
|
|
|
seems the medical fraternity in adelaide are the only ones with any common sense here. Wasn't it the same group who were th eonly ones to annouce that the red mitsi's were mdma and caffeine, no pma to be found? and now the nsw police put out a ridiculous press release about unsafe pills, but only say there's no markings that identify them. do they really think if they cry wolf people will take notice?
they are endangering lives with this policy
|
|
Nov-10-2004 22:29
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:27.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|