I think its time to post some pics and vids of swamper on TAsucks.com
OV
___________________
Swamper = ZZZZZZ
Nov-08-2004 18:20
VERTiG0
cunning linguist.
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: no longer Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Perhaps you guys could spell "too" correctly on the site there, originalVIBE
Nov-08-2004 19:06
Swamper
Webmonstah
Registered: Jan 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada
quote:
Originally posted by malek
is it so hard to setup disk mirroring ??
It is not worth gaining redundancy at the loss of I/O throughput. I'll take a loss of a days worth of post every couple of years versus having the board slow down.
Web content is on one HD, forums are on 2 other drives, raid-0 (striped).
Nov-08-2004 19:13
Orko
Digital Hippie
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
quote:
Originally posted by Swamper
It is not worth gaining redundancy at the loss of I/O throughput. I'll take a loss of a days worth of post every couple of years versus having the board slow down.
Web content is on one HD, forums are on 2 other drives, raid-0 (striped).
doesnt using raid-0 theoretically double the chance of losing data? and ive read reviews were raid-0 isnt that much faster than running raid in redundancy modes...
Nov-08-2004 19:51
dEsidEL
Fu Man Choonz
Registered: Aug 2000
Location: Below the Belt
Unleash tha TOTA manfest!
___________________
Palm Trees > Pine Trees , Sand > Snow
Nov-08-2004 19:54
Swamper
Webmonstah
Registered: Jan 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada
quote:
Originally posted by Orko
doesnt using raid-0 theoretically double the chance of losing data? and ive read reviews were raid-0 isnt that much faster than running raid in redundancy modes...
Yes, but raid-0(striping) is faster in all instances. A hard drive didn't 'die' so to speak, I just put the announcement like that so most ppl would know what happened... In reality the persistent-superblock and/or partition table on the first drive in the raid array got fux0red because I had to do a hard reboot on the system - since mysql was stuck in an infinite loop and ate up all system resources - it should've came up fine, but didn't, and everything I tried gave a dead end.
As seen from the console:
Last edited by itikia on Nov-08-2004 at 21:23
Nov-08-2004 20:00
amb_
Crisis in Clubland
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Waterloo
*wishes for vinum*
___________________
"That which is common to the greatest number has the least care bestowed upon it." -- Aristotle
Nov-08-2004 20:19
LKD
Omni-peasant
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Its June 18th, 2005, I'm at the Skybar
quote:
Originally posted by dEsidEL
Unleash tha TOTA manfest!
psst....not this thread....u shouldve posted in the OTHER thread
Told you I would have this site registered, built, and online before you hosted the destiny site.
Nov-08-2004 21:18
VERTiG0
cunning linguist.
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: no longer Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
quote:
Originally posted by Swamper
Yes, but raid-0(striping) is faster in all instances.
What about RAID-5?
Nov-08-2004 21:22
itikia
.
Registered: Jan 2001
Location: Toronto
Looks like you're in motion bro! LOL
quote:
Originally posted by Swamper
Yes, but raid-0(striping) is faster in all instances. A hard drive didn't 'die' so to speak, I just put the announcement like that so most ppl would know what happened... In reality the persistent-superblock and/or partition table on the first drive in the raid array got fux0red because I had to do a hard reboot on the system - since mysql was stuck in an infinite loop and ate up all system resources - it should've came up fine, but didn't, and everything I tried gave a dead end.
As seen from the console:
Nov-08-2004 21:22
amb_
Crisis in Clubland
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Waterloo
Oh man.
___________________
"That which is common to the greatest number has the least care bestowed upon it." -- Aristotle
