 |
|
|
|
 |
Special_K
I dont know anymore
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
|
|
much rather have a cd deck
|
|
Nov-11-2004 08:29
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Gunyouken
Senior tranceaddict

Registered: Jun 2004
Location: I've got a twanger and I'm not afraid to use it!!
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by nrjizer
Maybe so you can support the artists you love? |
Of coarse, it is ones duty, but I would much prefer to buy a record with a specific tune than downloading it, somehow paying for music that you download just doesn't appeal to me at all.
| quote: | Originally posted by nrjizer
Nope, FS just lets you play the tunes off the laptop. Your turntables and mixer are still the interface upon which you mix, just like with regular records. |
I don't think it's worth it, people that don't dj or have the deep apreciation for EDM that we have don't give a shit about beatmatching or any thing to do with proper mixing, so imo if you are gonna dj off a pc you might just as well dj with 2 sessions of winamp.
| quote: | Originally posted by nrjizer
Are you high? Do you even know what Final Scratch is, or what it does? To use it, you have to know how to mix with records and a mixer in the first place. |
Then wouldn't a mixer and records be more worth it?
| quote: | Originally posted by nrjizer
Boo hoo. So you'll actually have to work harder to find good records and make your sets unique? Too bad. Trust me, there are a million great tunes out there that you'll never find on mp3. You'll just have to divert your energy used to hunting down rare records to sifting through piles of mediocre and overplayed records for those unique gems. I have no sympathy for DJs who think working hard to set themselves apart is below them. |
I was refering to the future, cause most likely in the future people will be more inclined to digital. And I think artists and labels will prob be more inclined to release on digital.
| quote: | Originally posted by nrjizer
I still don't think FS is that fantastic. If you can afford a nice laptop and the FS software, I don't see why you can't afford vinyl. |

___________________
Reader's Digest:
| quote: | | Buying something as uncool as a turntable takes courage and planning. | 
My Discogs.
|
|
Nov-12-2004 12:07
|
|
|
 |
 |
DannyO
The Vinyl Hunter

Registered: May 2003
Location: Calgary.
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Cosmic Realm
nope, they did...
damn hipocrite
choose a side... i feel personally this is my own opinion to keep the real ecence of DJ-ing alive we should get rid of all this digital bullshit all together, thats FS, SSL and CDJ's and stick to whats worked for the past 20 years you know 2 Tech's and a mixer, though myself i feel like i would persoanlly want to use it to see what all the fuss is about, but would never bring it with me to the club... |
Try telling Zabiela to get rid of his CDJs , I know what your on about, but we need to progress forward, if something helps, why should we get rid of it, I like the ideas of some of this new technology thats come out, it can lead to better things, I'm not bothered if I ever use/have anything like FS, but I wouldn't want to get rid of CDJs from the scene, they can add alot to a set if you know how to use them, this is coming from a vinyl junkie who will always spin wax, but I can't wait till I can add a CDJ to my setup and then throw in my own samples/accapellas/beats/breaks, honestly there is only so much you can do with 2 decks, I know they can still do alot, but CDJs can do things that decks can't and so you can use that advantage and really add to a set.
But thats just my opinion.
|
|
Nov-12-2004 20:09
|
|
|
 |
 |
nrjizer
vive le deep

Registered: Jan 2001
Location: Bumfuck, GA
|
|
|
No, my arguments never changed. I don't care for FS at all, but I also don't care for people who talk about things they apparantly have no clue about (not to mention vinyl elitists). I'm just trying to set the record straight on a few things:
| quote: | I don't think it's worth it, people that don't dj or have the deep apreciation for EDM that we have don't give a shit about beatmatching or any thing to do with proper mixing, so imo if you are gonna dj off a pc you might just as well dj with 2 sessions of winamp.
|
But when you use FS, you're still adjusting the pitch on your Technics, you're still dropping the needle and cueing, you're still using the mixer and EQs to do your transitions. It's pretty much the same, except you're not picking up your record, replacing it, and putting on a new one. So comparing FS to 2 sessions of Winamp is like comparing a brand new Yamaha bike to one of those silly PowerWheels that your parents got you for Christmas when you were 9: One is a serious tool, the other is something that you use to kill time while wishing you had the real thing.
| quote: |
Then wouldn't a mixer and records be more worth it? |
While I agree (and always have, read my past posts), you're taking that quote out of context. I said that in response to "everyone will think they can mix cause they can open 2 or 3 sessions of winamp and be a dj." While I may not like FinalScratch personally, I can tell you with a fair bit of confidence that it's nothing like mixing with 2 sessions of winamp (and I'm sure people who use it can testify to this as well).
| quote: | | I was refering to the future, cause most likely in the future people will be more inclined to digital. And I think artists and labels will prob be more inclined to release on digital. |
Another thing is, serious DJs will accept nothing short of .WAV quality. Mp3's just won't cut it on a good sound system, period. I have a lot of amazing tunes on mp3 that I'll never spin, because I wan't the sets I play and hand out to be of the higest quality. I might get bored and play with it on a rainy day, but it'll never go into one of my performances or demos.
| quote: | | choose a side... i feel personally this is my own opinion to keep the real ecence of DJ-ing alive we should get rid of all this digital bullshit all together, thats FS, SSL and CDJ's and stick to whats worked for the past 20 years you know 2 Tech's and a mixer, though myself i feel like i would persoanlly want to use it to see what all the fuss is about, but would never bring it with me to the club... |
No, I won't choose a side. My CDJ-1000 MK2 is sitting comfortably next to my Technics MK5s, and that's the way I like it. Right now, there are big advantages to using vinyl, and there are big advantages to using CD decks. If you limit yourself to either, you're just missing out. This vinyl elitism bullshit drives me crazy. "The real essence of DJing?" I'm sorry, I thought that the real essence of DJing was taking other peoples music and crafting it together into one giant, flowing, dancable song. I guess I was wrong.
Tell you what, you go ahead and keep spinning on your 2 deck setup. The rest of us will be enjoying the fruits of technology.
___________________
NEW MIX [Feb/March 2008]
|
|
Nov-12-2004 20:36
|
|
|
 |
 |
DannyO
The Vinyl Hunter

Registered: May 2003
Location: Calgary.
|
|
|
Well Scratchworx now has more to tell on FS2, heres what I found:
| quote: | Maker of the recent Soundcraftsman v1 scratch tool NickNack has been lucky enough to lay his hands on Stanton's new Final Scratch 2. And like the jolly good chap he is, he's sharing his first impression with you all via the medium of .
Recorded at 3am in the morning, NickNack decided to snap a few pics, film some deck action and add a few words to fill you all in ahead of full reviews appearing soon. Anyway - I'll pass things over to Nick Nack:
"I will make this super simple and right to the point, b/c we will be doing a way more in depth review of FS2 here in the near future....actually it will be a side by side comparison to the Numark CDX and Rane Serato Scratch (these are the main 3 products that most of us are considering these days).
This review is just my initial impression of Stanton's Final Scratch 2 after using it for a day or so. I know there have been some very heated debates between Serato and FS users on this site and others, but let me just say that in this review and every other that I give, I am interested in one
thing, giving my honest opinion on a product. If there is something wrong with it, I will tell you...there is no reason for me to mislead or sugar coat things for you guys. I have friends that work at Numark, Rane and Stanton and at the end of the day I am just like you, I want to know what the best product is out there.
The install of FS 2 is very simple. First, install a driver for the scratch amp, then install Traktor FS, then you hook up the scratch amp to your turntables. Once everything was connected, I fired up Traktor FS for the first time. I was so anxious to play with this bad boy, I didn't even configure it right off, I just wanted to see if I could use it out of the box. Sure enough...I could. Their initial/default settings for latency, rumble filter, etc.. were almost right on the money (this will obviously
depend on the laptop/computer you are running this on though). However, after about 5 mins of playing around, some wierd things started happening. Some digital hiccups and other drop outs. I decided it was probably time for me to really configure this thing to my actual computer. Doing this was pretty easy and I was able to get the latency down to about 4ms overall (I have a P4 3.2gHz computer). After the proper configuration, I went back to scratching. I was very impressed at the fact that I could do almost any record hand scratch with FS2. Now, I am not anywhere near as advanced of a scratcher as some of you guys are, but I tried fast stuff, slow stuff, erratic stuff, etc... and I only rarely got wierd behavior. This weird behavior mainly happens if the record skips. It takes the computer a split second to refind it's location, so it can throw you off a bit. However, there is a skipless button setting that FS2 has cleverly implemented to help
make this a non-issue.
There are no complaints on the sound quality (I have more testing to do on this though). Loading songs can take about 10-20 seconds sometimes, which seemed a bit strange to me, but hey...I guess if you open the same file in say Sound Forge...it will take about as long.
There is one thing that kinda bugged me and that was the wav display. It seemed to be a bit slow to draw. And if you needle drop, the wav display takes a while to catch up redrawing. Seems like there could be some improvement there as well as some other minor things in the user interface, but overall this system has really caught my attention. I will be curious to see what others think and also how I feel about it in a few weeks. Check out the video - VIDEO of me doing some really bad scratches at 3am (damn Taiwanese coffee from a can is a mfer..hopefully I can go to bed soon). This video should show what FS2 is capable of in about 2 mins.
Props to Gizmo and Skratchworx for letting me do this review! 'Preciate that.
NickNack
[email protected]
www.crowdcontrolrecords.com
Scratchamp
Scratchamp2
FS2 Screen
Deck
Heres the link....
|
|
|
Nov-19-2004 01:37
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:04.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|