 |
|
|
|
 |
scribey
tranceaddict in training
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: canada
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by onceler
I'm not a big fan of Pioneer's build quality and overall sound quality. I have owned or been a partial owner of (2) DJM-500's for around 7 years or so. I have seen firsthand how they age. To me, the only reason to get a Pioneer would be the need for easy effects. The effects on the Ecler are a little more in-depth and take a bit of getting used to while the A&H don't have effects (other than the LFO or whatever that one thing they have on there). |
A&H have VCF filters which are alot more diverse than the lill effects on a DJM.
|
|
Dec-16-2004 17:58
|
|
|
 |
 |
tu_face
No Known Cure...

Registered: Oct 2000
Location: Sheffield, UK
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by scribey
A&H have VCF filters which are alot more diverse than the lill effects on a DJM. |
well, no, they are not. you have 3 filters, thats it. granted, they are amazing filters, and completely outclass the filter on the djm mixers, but the djm mixers also have delay, echo, pan, transform, reverb, flange, zip (pitch) + the 600 & 3000 has a sampler. i would say the djm mixers have more diverse effects 
___________________
MUGGETS
|
|
Dec-17-2004 09:43
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:09.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|