 |
|
|
|
 |
St_Andrew
I <3 NYC

Registered: May 2003
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Yoepus
All dictatorships, no matter how benevolent are worse off for the people than free societies. Unless they are a transitional government into democracy or an accountable government, dicators must use fear to control their populace and stay in place of power. |
That is not necisarily true tho, first of all, at least in theory a dictatorship can be much better than democracy for many reasons, and second of all, there are many instances where a democracy have used fear in order to stay in power to (read George W Bush ).
All that said, democracy is a lot better than dictatorships in general, but i wouldnt go so far as to say that "All dictatorships, no matter how benevolent" are worse than a democracy.
|
|
May-23-2005 23:29
|
|
|
 |
 |
Yoepus
Neo-condimist

Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Ketchup fields, Texas
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by St_Andrew
All that said, democracy is a lot better than dictatorships in general, but i wouldnt go so far as to say that "All dictatorships, no matter how benevolent" are worse than a democracy. |
Its all a perspective of time. If you look at it in a span of decades then liberal democracy always trumps dictatorships.
Given your G W Bush example, assuming he's the worst guy, uses fear, etc, he's out and replaced in 8 years. Theres a houst, a senate, a judicary all to counter-balance his powers. There is a free and open press (who critizes him non-stop) and people don't get shot, killed, or arrested for expressing their opinions.
Now in a dictatorship if it to exist more than a number of years it must oppress its own citizens by curtailing the freedom of speech and press. If it does not do this, the tide will simply turn against the dictator and it will eventually evolve into a democracy.
Under George Bush's democracy I can say "fuck George Bush, go to hell you fucking sleaze bag" and I will get applause. In Cuba if I say "fuck Fidel Castro, he's a fucking sleeze bag who should go to hell", I get a bullet in the head.
I don't care how good the quality of life is, without that fundamental ability to express your own opinion, you are simply not a free man. We take this freedom for granted because we have always known it, we have grown up with it, and know no different. It is incomprehensible to us to realize a world where what you say can kill you.
___________________
SAVE ZIONIST MUSTARD: BUY ZIONIST KETCHUP!
Click here to support the free mustard alliance.
|
|
May-24-2005 03:21
|
|
|
 |
 |
St_Andrew
I <3 NYC

Registered: May 2003
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Yoepus
Its all a perspective of time. If you look at it in a span of decades then liberal democracy always trumps dictatorships.
Given your G W Bush example, assuming he's the worst guy, uses fear, etc, he's out and replaced in 8 years. Theres a houst, a senate, a judicary all to counter-balance his powers. There is a free and open press (who critizes him non-stop) and people don't get shot, killed, or arrested for expressing their opinions.
Now in a dictatorship if it to exist more than a number of years it must oppress its own citizens by curtailing the freedom of speech and press. If it does not do this, the tide will simply turn against the dictator and it will eventually evolve into a democracy.
Under George Bush's democracy I can say "fuck George Bush, go to hell you fucking sleaze bag" and I will get applause. In Cuba if I say "fuck Fidel Castro, he's a fucking sleeze bag who should go to hell", I get a bullet in the head.
I don't care how good the quality of life is, without that fundamental ability to express your own opinion, you are simply not a free man. We take this freedom for granted because we have always known it, we have grown up with it, and know no different. It is incomprehensible to us to realize a world where what you say can kill you. |
I did never say that Cuba is a better country than the US to live in (that would be an insane thing to say, for the obvious reasons you stated), however I stated that a democracy doesnt have to be better than a dictatorship.
Imagine two Countries, country A where a dictator rules, and Country B where Democracy rules.
In country A, El Presidento have been ruling for several years, he is a very good man, although he has never been voted there he is still always working for the good of the country. He takes care of corruption, he dares to take the decions that the people might not like, but is best for the country in the long run etc. El Presidento also makes sure that everyone can have their opinion, and no one can get shot for saying the wrong thing, and they can try to affect El Presidento, and he does change if you have good arguments, but you simply cant vote him out.
Meanwhile in country B, Mr Democrato is ruling, he has just been elected for a 4 year term, and he must do everything to make sure he stays in power. To do this he is always making sure the people are happy, in the short run, but since he know that the ppl of country b is a pretty stupid ppl, he cant take the vital long term decions that would be bad in the short term, cause then he wouldnt get reelected. He also starts a lot of wars with other countries since Mr Democrato knows that this is a way of keeping the country together, and securing his second term in office.
Which is the best country to live in? Country A i would say, cause it is the country that is going to be better of in the long run, and you wont have to be affraid of everything.
Its kinda theoretical, but get my point? 
|
|
May-24-2005 03:32
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:38.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|