 |
|
|
|
 |
Anomyst
www.interview.net.au
Registered: May 2003
Location: Melbourne
|
|
|
Would this one be suitable?
Billion 5100W Wireless ADSL Modem/Router 4 Ports
___________________
Too old for this shit. But still luvin it
|
|
Aug-08-2005 04:22
|
|
|
 |
 |
djway
Trooper
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: .syd.au.
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Anomyst
Would this one be suitable?
Billion 5100W Wireless ADSL Modem/Router 4 Ports |
Yes, but looking on Whirlpool, A LOT of people have issues with it. I suggest Linksys for quality. For 'can do the job, will save money in short term for a long term trade off on sanity' Billion is cool.
Pay more now, get quality. Save the frustration later.
--djway
|
|
Aug-08-2005 04:47
|
|
|
 |
 |
pimp
Senior tranceaddict

Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
Hey guys I work for DLINK technical support so if you need to know anything about wireless products just shout.
First off current DLINK products are not crap, I say that not just because I work for them (I usually put down the companies i work for) but the products are quite good. Most people say they are crap only because they are cheaper than most and they automatically think they are shit. Well off the record surprise surprise many of the components that more expensive brands *cough netgear,*cough Linksys uses dlink products or components so don't be fooled by the fancy name or price tag. Secondly they all fuck up, and have their share of problems. It's only that dlink hold 20% of the home networking market, 11% to netgear, and something like 9% to linksys - that you may seem to hear more horror stories.
Personally Dlink wireless products are quite reliable as most brands are nowadays and if people are paying them out its only because they don't know how to use them properly or dont understand the nature of wireless technology.
ALso if you unsure about WEP, you can use WPA-PSK which is an authentication protocol. Most routers and AP's now support them.
Regardless if you use one or the other they are pretty safe but like someoen said not fail proof someone could eventually hack into them like people hack into NASA but like really who cares, your average Joe Neghbour is not going to spend hundreds of computing hours cracking into your computer just to retrieve your happy snaps? It's probbaly less painful just to steal your computer.
Lastly there are other secuirty measures you can use in routers such as the inherent FIREWALL and filters - such as mac filters, IP filters - and disabling SSID broadcasting (so the wireless network doesnt broadcast its name out your neighbours).
a good starting router would be a DI-524 (if you are hoping to still use your current *ethernet based* modem ADSL or CABLE, and the wireless adapter cards if you need them are DWL-G510 (PC) or DWL-G630 (LAPTOP). They run on G standard 54Mbps. ALternatively if you want a new DSL modem then you should get a DSL-G604T. It is a wireless router + onboard modem and also supports ADSL2/2+ which alot of ISP's are now offering, you might want ot think about that if you want the new ADSL2 speeds 12-20Mbps if I am correct. You can get the router + adapter pack for as little as $140.00 at most resellers but if you send me photos of your sister I can get them for you cheaper - staff discount.
P.S.
=================
Don't be fooled by 108 MBps, each brand hav e their own super G standard (108) however this shit hardly works in a normal house believe me on that, and youll probably only run about 60-70 and not worth the problems it causes.
Most houses have too much interference (cordless phones, microwaves) to efficiently produce 108 all the time. THe standard uses all 11 channels to transmit data, instead of just picking one channel as normal 54Mbs does. THis causes a heap of problems anyone unless you have a noise free environment which is highly unlikely. If it worked reliablly theyld already have standardised it.
Sorry about the RANT.
PS PAULIE EAD>
Last edited by pimp on Aug-09-2005 at 15:02
|
|
Aug-09-2005 14:50
|
|
|
 |
 |
djway
Trooper
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: .syd.au.
|
|
|
Interesting opinion there pimp. 2 ex employees of your both left due to shite products generally(mind you that was a year and a bit ago). (K.lee and R.chow.)
Linysys is now owned by Cisco(per www.linksys.com), which runs over 70% of the internet's routers.
On a home WAP, I'd consider MAC based filtering to be good enough authentication; WPA-PSK is open to dictionary attacks and also adds CPU overhead to every packet.
I do, HIGHLY agree with you on the Super G...TOtal wank!
--djway
|
|
Aug-09-2005 15:00
|
|
|
 |
 |
sunrise3500
The Earth is flat.

Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Under the sea
|
|
|
Aug-09-2005 15:02
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:00.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|