|
| quote: | Originally posted by jdat
What an ignorant statement.
LCD's have a smaller foot print on the desk but the colouring, shadowing, dead pixels, trailing, among other things aren't just worth it in most cases.
There's such a wide range of quality on LCD's from the worst to the semi best .... and they are also very imprecise.
Crt's are unfortunately still the norm for quality, unless you have serious money for high end LCD. |
What he said. Plus, LCDs bug me for some reason. So what if they're smaller in size? I'd sacrifice desk-space for quality.
A couple of months ago I upgraded from a shitty 12" monitor to a 19" NEC MultiSync FE992. It's fucking gorgeous.
|