quote:

Originally posted by jethro /cell phone/etc.

How much could you charge for that lol?

quote:

Originally posted by Thriller How much could you charge for that lol?

if you have the skills to make use of it whatever is the standard rate.

anyone here besides me old enough to remember kraftwerk using pocket calculators in their live performances back in the day?

quote:

Originally posted by dj_bas guess it doesn't matter either way, but ALL cds could get just a little un-fun

i agree vinyl is simply way more fun. nothing wrong with digital, but vinyl is king in my book

___________________
www.soundcloud.com/juniorchavez || http://www.beatport.com/artist/junior-chavez/264819

"There are no barriers, only choices."

Did anyone notice that Audiojelly has started to charge £2.40 for 320kbps tracks? That's $4.33 per track. Digital compressed files are starting to catch up to vinyl pricing.

quote:

Originally posted by St. Michael Did anyone notice that Audiojelly has started to charge £2.40 for 320kbps tracks? That's $4.33 per track. Digital compressed files are starting to catch up to vinyl pricing.

they sell different compression rates for different prices? why wouldn't someone just get the lowest one and recompress?

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by dj_bas they sell different compression rates for different prices? why wouldn't someone just get the lowest one and recompress?

lol you're lame. the lowest bit rate tracks ARE MISSING DATA... you don't understand compression very much do you?

___________________
www.soundcloud.com/juniorchavez || http://www.beatport.com/artist/junior-chavez/264819

"There are no barriers, only choices."

Once the file is compressed, the quality is degraded/compromised forever.

quote:

Originally posted by St. Michael Once the file is compressed, the quality is degraded/compromised forever.

precisely.

___________________
www.soundcloud.com/juniorchavez || http://www.beatport.com/artist/junior-chavez/264819

"There are no barriers, only choices."

quote:

Originally posted by Junior Chavez lol you're lame. the lowest bit rate tracks ARE MISSING DATA... you don't understand compression very much do you?

oh, i used the wrong words then

lets say you buy the 192 kbps version, you can always convert to a higher compression. then the computer magically finds this missing data which is actually stored in a meta file that comes with the mp3

trust me i'm a doctor

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by St. Michael Did anyone notice that Audiojelly has started to charge £2.40 for 320kbps tracks? That's $4.33 per track. Digital compressed files are starting to catch up to vinyl pricing.

No problem, let them get greedy and destroy their market just like the RIAA did.

What a shame..

quote:

Originally posted by dj_bas oh, i used the wrong words then lets say you buy the 192 kbps version, you can always convert to a higher compression. then the computer magically finds this missing data which is actually stored in a meta file that comes with the mp3 trust me i'm a doctor

lol yeah you can get a 192kbps and recompress to a 392kpbs... but it just magnified the shitty sound cuz it already had data missing....

so you could in theory DO THAT. but it still sounds like a crappy 192.... cuz the same data is present.

___________________
www.soundcloud.com/juniorchavez || http://www.beatport.com/artist/junior-chavez/264819

"There are no barriers, only choices."

I love my technics. I also love my CDJ