Originally posted by Dean Millson
Did you just completely contradict yourself there, or is it just me soups?
hahaha no
because we all know that the djs that are your FAVOURITES are who you vote for, whether or not your favourite dj is the most talented dj out there or not
Oct-21-2005 00:19
Dean Millson
MC
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Below the bassline...
so there is in fact no difference between this and the DJMag poll whatsoever is what you're saying
___________________
Pretty Simple;
Saturdays at Ffour.
Oct-21-2005 00:33
00soups00
cruzin
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Melbourne
quote:
Originally posted by Dean Millson
so there is in fact no difference between this and the DJMag poll whatsoever is what you're saying
to be honest, no not really.
its just that this is a more exclusive opinion base then DjMag.com results.
Oct-21-2005 00:36
narcism
faithless fangirl
Registered: Jul 2002
Location: Let go of my mind
after watching g&d dont see how they can be so high
dont know which ones does the better trainwrecks, them or tiesto
and i love the fact that
135. Boy George
even made the poll
and i think i must of been the only sod to vote for darren tate
or Nu-NRG @ #19. i love those boys, dont get me wrong, but theyre hardly top 20 DJ material.
___________________
Oct-21-2005 02:31
Teflon_Teapot
bored? me too
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne
where did BT poll?
___________________
ATTORNEY: Now doctor, isn't it true that when a person dies in his sleep,
he doesn't know about it until the next morning?
WITNESS: Did you actually pass the bar exam?
Oct-21-2005 02:52
Fpcookie
yehboi
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: melbourne
why dont u consider nu nrg top 20 dj material? their set at digital was certainly better than some sets ive heard of ppl ranked higher up than them.
bt was ranked 35 teflon
Oct-21-2005 03:24
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion
Registered: Jul 2002
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by Fpcookie
why dont u consider nu nrg top 20 dj material? their set at digital was certainly better than some sets ive heard of ppl ranked higher up than them.
bt was ranked 35 teflon
from a technical standpoint i dont think theyre particularly good (in an international context). a lot of the time they seem to extend outros/intros in their sets to mix together songs out of key or whatever, and that ruins the flow (for me) as well as having the odd beatmatching issue that im harsh on given their international status.
___________________
Oct-21-2005 03:32
Fpcookie
yehboi
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: melbourne
well from the time ive seen them and from the 15+ sets of their ive listened to ive never heard any fuck ups in beatmatching.
i might be wrong here, but if someone plays live (which they do all the time) beatmatching and key pitching isnt an issue at it is all computerrised? i dunno
Oct-21-2005 03:38
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion
Registered: Jul 2002
Location:
^^ well, youre probably not as used to hearing mis-aligned beats as i am
___________________
Oct-21-2005 03:47
Philby
Statement: Die, meatbag!
Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
