|
| quote: | Originally posted by crackity jones
Wow, after all these amazingly informed *ahem* responses, it's surprising how adamant people are about not using belt drives. The only fault I suspect with belt drives is a lack of torque to get your record back up to speed after scratching/cueing.
Stil, the elitism of audiophiles never ceases to amaze me... platter vibrations my elbow. |
Lol, not really sure what your issue is, if you've ever played on a pair of direct drive decks then a pair of belt drive you'll realise how flimsy and delicate they feel. It's not a matter of elitism, we're not just saying "direct drives are better, er, cos they are"... for me it's simply a matter of experience using the things!
A lot of it's because of the build quality of cheaper decks (admittedly most direct drive decks in the same price range tend to feel just as flimsy - but you'll find it hard getting a belt drive deck which isn't aimed at the bottom of the market) plus the pitch wavers a lot more with belt drive as the band stretches slightly, making it harder to beatmatch really accurately with them - although the question was regarding scratching which this doesn't really make any difference to.
___________________
Stu Cox | 

|