|
| quote: | Originally posted by armanivespucci
Yeah, I did notice that it was good for pads and certain basses... I suppose I might not have given it enough time. Although, someone did say that Albino was a subtractive synth. As I understand it, doesn't that automatically limit it compared to a synth based on frequency modulation? I've only read bits on modular synthesis, but am I way off? |
FM (or rather phase modulation if you want to get real technical and non-patent infringing), is definitely not modular synthesis to get one thing out of the way . Modular synthesis refers to mainly that of older analog synths where there would be physical modules that you could buy and pop in your synth. Say you dont have enough oscillators, with modular synths, you just go buy another one. The drawback is that it requires a steep learning curve because you literally had to wire EVERYTHING up. Presets werent even really an idea at the time. If you found a sound you liked, you better whip out your camera and start taking pictures cause thats your best bet to getting the sound again.
However, as time progressed, synths got simpler and simpler until they were jsut a plain subtractive synth. Oberheim slapped the industry with a new radical idea though. When the Matrix 6r came out, the idea of internal re-routing started. Basicly, it functioned as a standard subtractive analog synth, but if you wanted to rewire it, it was just a couple button pushes away from having an oscillator routed to... the frequency cutoff or something. Newer 'moduler' synths, such as Albino try to grip onto that same idea that the Matrix started but they arent nearly as flexible and definitely not as flexible as an actual moduler synth. Albino does sound great if you run it through enough processing, but then so does every other synth. If you work long enough, you can make music out of white noise static from a TV.
As for Blue. Like I said before, its a standard FM synth. It has a great interface but the FX jsut arent nearly as good as those on FM7. Its cheaper in price and great for the cost. But when you bring up FM sounding more flexible than a subtractive synth, the answer is a bit more complex than a yes or a no. In short, FM can sound pretty mean and bassy and yet still airy and sweet but again, a lot of it is in how you program it. Pretty much with FM, you have a 50/50 chance of ending up with a patch that makes absolutely no sound at all. The time it takes to debug a patch that isnt working can take longer than it did to make it and for a lot of people, its a big turn off. This is why synths such as the DX7 were only popular because of thier great set of presets. FM can be more flexible in its sounds than subtractive synths, but dont ever expect to be able to make a non-digital sounding isntrument with an FM synth. The simple fact of the matter is that FM is different than subtractive synthesis. Both have thier worlds and specific sounds and they tend not to cross a lot because they both have good places in every song they are used in.
Cheers,
Zac
___________________
DarkSword - Turn On
DarkSword - Hell Bound
DarkSword - Fresh
DarkSword - Styled
DarkSword - Shadowed Sun
DarkSword - Turning Forward
DarkSword - ALLFRUIT
Pacific Mint vs DarkSword - Climax Zone 2005
SoundClick Page
 
---FL Studio 9 User---
|