Cool Thanks for the votes!

*runs upstairs for his Sennheiser*
feedback in 20
Now listening to XDR's. Sounds really good so far, can hardly tell it's a mashup. Little aggressive on the bass. F*cking awesome mash-up. Technically very good (audible experience) and I like the tunes too.

RX: sounds much slower, which isn't a problem. Hi-hats sound really well together in the first minutes. 2m48 and onward, I seem to hear small fluctuations? Then, as the bass comes in a little later, you can hear it come in, it sounds pretty ok, but it gives away the mash-upness of the track. Right before 8:40 it sounds quite mashed lol. Very good effort though, better than what I would've performed.

I feel as if XDR's mix is technically superior; that the non-da-hool track annoys me, I didn't take into account, but it may not be a bad idea to shorten it.

Good efforts! Congrats, XDR, deserved winner imo. RX, keep em coming in your sets, matey

Last edited by Belgian Bonzai on Nov-17-2005 at 15:47

I think both matchups are perfectly done. To make them compete for the better one must be done if both have matchups the same songs and then we can choose which of both did it better or more evenly.

I recommend that both XDR and RX matchup their competitors same songs and then we can choose which version is better.

This is my Opinion anyway.

Thanks and congrats to both XDR and RX nicely done to both of you.

Attn, DJ-Eros

PS: Please comment on my mixes posted under the name of "The Perfect Mix" thanks, here is a link to one:

The Pefect Mix Vol 56 :: DJ-Eros

I disagree to the extent that choosing the tracks to match is part of the job.